Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Cervical radiculopathy

  • Cervical Injuries and Treatment (HJ Kim, Section Editor)
  • Published:
Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Cervical radiculopathy is a common clinical scenario. Patients with radiculopathy typically present with neck pain, arm pain, or both. We review the epidemiology of cervical radiculopathy and discuss the diagnosis of this condition. This includes an overview of the pertinent findings on the patient history and physical examination. We also discuss relevant clinical syndromes that must be considered in the differential diagnosis including peripheral nerve entrapment syndromes and shoulder pathology. The natural history of cervical radiculopathy is reviewed and options for management are discussed. These options include conservative management, non-operative modalities such as physical therapy, steroid injections, and operative intervention. While the exact indications for surgical intervention have not yet been elucidated, we provide an overview of the available literature regarding indications and discuss the timing of intervention. The surgical outcomes of anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF), cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA), and posterior cervical foraminotomy (PCF) are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance

  1. Radhakrishnan K, Litchy WJ, O’Fallon WM, et al. Epidemiology of cervical radiculopathy. A population-based study from rochester, minnesota, 1976 through 1990. Brain. 1994;117(Pt 2):325–35. The most widely cited epidemiologic study describing the incidence of cervical radiculopathy.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Schoenfeld AJ, George AA, Bader JO, et al. Incidence and epidemiology of cervical radiculopathy in the united states military: 2000 to 2009. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2012;25:17–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kelsey JL, Githens PB, Walter SD, et al. An epidemiological study of acute prolapsed cervical intervertebral disc. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1984;66:907–14.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Woods BI, Hilibrand AS. Cervical radiculopathy: epidemiology, etiology, diagnosis, and treatment. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2015;28:251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Wong JJ, Cote P, Quesnele JJ, et al. The course and prognostic factors of symptomatic cervical disc herniation with radiculopathy: a systematic review of the literature. Spine J. 2014;14:1781–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Rhee JM, Yoon T, Riew KD. Cervical radiculopathy. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2007;15:486–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kang JD, Stefanovic-Racic M, McIntyre LA, et al. Toward a biochemical understanding of human intervertebral disc degeneration and herniation. Contributions of nitric oxide, interleukins, prostaglandin E2, and matrix metalloproteinases. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1997;22:1065–73.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Van Boxem K, Huntoon M, Van Zundert J, et al. Pulsed radiofrequency: a review of the basic science as applied to the pathophysiology of radicular pain: a call for clinical translation. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2014;39:149–59.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Nakki A, Battie MC, Kaprio J. Genetics of disc-related disorders: current findings and lessons from other complex diseases. Eur Spine J. 2014;23(3):354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Sampath P, Bendebba M, Davis JD, et al. Outcome in patients with cervical radiculopathy. Prospective, multicenter study with independent clinical review. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1999;24:591–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. LEES F, TURNER JW. Natural history and prognosis of cervical spondylosis. Br Med J. 1963;2:1607–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Wainner RS, Gill H. Diagnosis and nonoperative management of cervical radiculopathy. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2000;30:728–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Viikari-Juntura E, Takala E, Riihimaki H, et al. Predictive validity of symptoms and signs in the neck and shoulders. J Clin Epidemiol. 2000;53:800–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. YOSS RE, CORBIN KB, MACCARTY CS, et al. Significance of symptoms and signs in localization of involved root in cervical disk protrusion. Neurology. 1957;7:673–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Rubinstein SM, Pool JJ, van Tulder MW, et al. A systematic review of the diagnostic accuracy of provocative tests of the neck for diagnosing cervical radiculopathy. Eur Spine J. 2007;16:307–19. An excellent overview of the clinical tests for radiculopathy and their diagnostic utility.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Eubanks JD. Cervical radiculopathy: nonoperative management of neck pain and radicular symptoms. Am Fam Physician. 2010;81:33–40.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Tong HC, Haig AJ, Yamakawa K. The spurling test and cervical radiculopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002;27:156–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Alrawi MF, Khalil NM, Mitchell P, et al. The value of neurophysiological and imaging studies in predicting outcome in the surgical treatment of cervical radiculopathy. Eur Spine J. 2007;16:495–500.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Caridi JM, Pumberger M, Hughes AP. Cervical radiculopathy: a review. HSS J. 2011;7:265–72.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Saal JS, Saal JA, Yurth EF. Nonoperative management of herniated cervical intervertebral disc with radiculopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1996;21:1877–83.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Dreyer SJ, Boden SD. Nonoperative treatment of neck and arm pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1998;23:2746–54.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Cheng CH, Tsai LC, Chung HC, et al. Exercise training for non-operative and post-operative patient with cervical radiculopathy: a literature review. J Phys Ther Sci. 2015;27:3011–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Kuijper B, Tans JT, Beelen A, et al. Cervical collar or physiotherapy versus wait and see policy for recent onset cervical radiculopathy: randomised trial. BMJ. 2009;339:b3883.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Diab AA, Moustafa IM. The efficacy of forward head correction on nerve root function and pain in cervical spondylotic radiculopathy: a randomized trial. Clin Rehabil. 2012;26:351–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Jellad A, Ben Salah Z, Boudokhane S, et al. The value of intermittent cervical traction in recent cervical radiculopathy. Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2009;52:638–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Fritz JM, Thackeray A, Brennan GP, et al. Exercise only, exercise with mechanical traction, or exercise with over-door traction for patients with cervical radiculopathy, with or without consideration of status on a previously described subgrouping rule: a randomized clinical trial. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2014;44:45–57.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Young IA, Michener LA, Cleland JA, et al. Manual therapy, exercise, and traction for patients with cervical radiculopathy: a randomized clinical trial. Phys Ther. 2009;89:632–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Gross A, Langevin P, Burnie SJ, et al. Manipulation and mobilisation for neck pain contrasted against an inactive control or another active treatment. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;9, CD004249.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Ke JQ, Yin B, Fu FW, et al. A case report of locked-in syndrome due to bilateral vertebral artery dissection after cervical spine manipulation treated by arterial embolectomy. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016;95:e2693.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Nakao Y, Terai H. Embolic brain infarction related to posttraumatic occlusion of vertebral artery resulting from cervical spine injury: a case report. J Med Case Rep. 2014;8:344.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Biller J, Sacco RL, Albuquerque FC, et al. Cervical arterial dissections and association with cervical manipulative therapy: a statement for healthcare professionals from the american heart association/american stroke association. Stroke. 2014;45:3155–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Mimata Y, Murakami H, Sato K, et al. Bilateral cerebellar and brain stem infarction resulting from vertebral artery injury following cervical trauma without radiographic damage of the spinal column: a case report. Skelet Radiol. 2014;43:99–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Albuquerque FC, Hu YC, Dashti SR, et al. Craniocervical arterial dissections as sequelae of chiropractic manipulation: patterns of injury and management. J Neurosurg. 2011;115:1197–205.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Stav A, Ovadia L, Sternberg A, et al. Cervical epidural steroid injection for cervicobrachialgia. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1993;37:562–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Carragee EJ, Hurwitz EL, Cheng I, et al. Treatment of neck pain: injections and surgical interventions: results of the bone and joint decade 2000–2010 task force on neck pain and its associated disorders. J Manip Physiol Ther. 2009;32:176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Manchikanti L, Nampiaparampil DE, Candido KD, et al. Do cervical epidural injections provide long-term relief in neck and upper extremity pain? A systematic review. Pain Physician. 2015;18:39–60. A review of various recent trials (cited below) examining the impact of epidural injections on neck and upper extremity pain. The authors summarize the results of their various clinical trails in this manuscript as well.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Manchikanti L, Cash KA, Pampati V, et al. A randomized, double-blind, active control trial of fluoroscopic cervical interlaminar epidural injections in chronic pain of cervical disc herniation: results of a 2-year follow-up. Pain Physician. 2013;16:465–78.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Diwan S, Manchikanti L, Benyamin RM, et al. Effectiveness of cervical epidural injections in the management of chronic neck and upper extremity pain. Pain Physician. 2012;15:405.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Manchikanti L, Malla Y, Cash KA, et al. Fluoroscopic cervical interlaminar epidural injections in managing chronic pain of cervical postsurgery syndrome: preliminary results of a randomized, double-blind, active control trial. Pain Physician. 2012;15:13–25.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Castagnera L, Maurette P, Pointillart V, et al. Long-term results of cervical epidural steroid injection with and without morphine in chronic cervical radicular pain. Pain. 1994;58:239–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Benny B, Azari P, Briones D. Complications of cervical transforaminal epidural steroid injections. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2010;89:601–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Levine MJ, Albert TJ, Smith MD. Cervical radiculopathy: diagnosis and nonoperative management. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 1996;4:305–16. Notable for being one of the few papers to provide an algorithmic approach to managing cervical radiculopathy. This algorithm has been adopted by various subsequent publications.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Burneikiene S, Nelson EL, Mason A, et al. The duration of symptoms and clinical outcomes in patients undergoing anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for degenerative disc disease and radiculopathy. Spine J. 2015;15:427–32. One of the only papers providing a guideline for the timing of intervention in cervical radiculopathy.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Engquist M, Lofgren H, Oberg B, et al. Factors affecting the outcome of surgical versus nonsurgical treatment of cervical radiculopathy: a randomized, controlled study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015;40:1553–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. van Geest S, Kuijper B, Oterdoom M, et al. CASINO: surgical or nonsurgical treatment for cervical radiculopathy, a randomised controlled trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2014;15:129.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Shriver MF, Lewis DJ, Kshettry VR, et al. Pseudoarthrosis rates in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a meta-analysis. Spine J. 2015;15:2016–27.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Bertalanffy H, Eggert HR. Clinical long-term results of anterior discectomy without fusion for treatment of cervical radiculopathy and myelopathy. A follow-up of 164 cases. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1988;90:127–35.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Donaldson JW, Nelson PB. Anterior cervical discectomy without interbody fusion. Surg Neurol. 2002;57:5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Yamamoto I, Ikeda A, Shibuya N, et al. Clinical long-term results of anterior discectomy without interbody fusion for cervical disc disease. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1991;16:272–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Watters WC, Levinthal R. Anterior cervical discectomy with and without fusion. Results, complications, and long-term follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1994;19:2343–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Lehmann CL, Buchowski JM, Stoker GE, et al. Neurologic recovery after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Global Spine J. 2014;4:41–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Burkus JK, Traynelis VC, Haid Jr RW, et al. Clinical and radiographic analysis of an artificial cervical disc: 7-year follow-up from the prestige prospective randomized controlled clinical trial: clinical article. J Neurosurg Spine. 2014;21:516–28.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Coric D, Nunley PD, Guyer RD, et al. Prospective, randomized, multicenter study of cervical arthroplasty: 269 patients from the Kineflex|C artificial disc investigational device exemption study with a minimum 2-year follow-up: clinical article. J Neurosurg Spine. 2011;15:348–58.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Davis RJ, Nunley PD, Kim KD, et al. Two-level total disc replacement with mobi-C cervical artificial disc versus anterior discectomy and fusion: a prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter clinical trial with 4-year follow-up results. J Neurosurg Spine. 2015;22:15–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Phillips FM, Geisler FH, Gilder KM, et al. Long-term outcomes of the US FDA IDE prospective, randomized controlled clinical trial comparing PCM cervical disc arthroplasty with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015;40:674–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Sasso RC, Anderson PA, Riew KD, et al. Results of cervical arthroplasty compared with anterior discectomy and fusion: four-year clinical outcomes in a prospective, randomized controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011;93:1684–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Hu Y, Lv G, Ren S, et al. Mid- to long-term outcomes of cervical disc arthroplasty versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for treatment of symptomatic cervical disc disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of eight prospective randomized controlled trials. PLoS One. 2016;11, e0149312. A systematic-review of the longest-term outcomes of cervical disc arthroplasty showing consistently lower re-operation rates and greater clinical success with disc arthroplasty vs. ACDF.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Peolsson A, Peolsson M. Predictive factors for long-term outcome of anterior cervical decompression and fusion: a multivariate data analysis. Eur Spine J. 2008;17:406–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Bolesta MJ, Rechtine GR, Chrin AM. Three- and four-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with plate fixation: a prospective study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000;25:6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Jho HD, Kim MH, Kim WK. Anterior cervical microforaminotomy for spondylotic cervical myelopathy: part 2. Neurosurgery. 2002;51:54.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Kotil K, Bilge T. Prospective study of anterior cervical microforaminotomy for cervical radiculopathy. J Clin Neurosci. 2008;15:749–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Cornelius JF, Bruneau M, George B. Microsurgical cervical nerve root decompression via an anterolateral approach: clinical outcome of patients treated for spondylotic radiculopathy. Neurosurgery. 2007;61:80. discussion 980.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Park YK, Moon HJ, Kwon TH, et al. Long-term outcomes following anterior foraminotomy for one- or two-level cervical radiculopathy. Eur Spine J. 2013;22:1489–96.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. Hacker RJ, Miller CG. Failed anterior cervical foraminotomy. J Neurosurg. 2003;98:126–30.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Zhang Y, Liang C, Tao Y, et al. Cervical total disc replacement is superior to anterior cervical decompression and fusion: a meta-analysis of prospective randomized controlled trials. PLoS One. 2015;10, e0117826.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  66. Janssen ME, Zigler JE, Spivak JM, et al. ProDisc-C total disc replacement versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for single-level symptomatic cervical disc disease: seven-year follow-up of the prospective randomized U.S. Food and drug administration investigational device exemption study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015;97:1738–47.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Gao Y, Liu M, Li T, et al. A meta-analysis comparing the results of cervical disc arthroplasty with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) for the treatment of symptomatic cervical disc disease. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013;95:555–61.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  68. Ren C, Song Y, Xue Y, et al. Mid- to long-term outcomes after cervical disc arthroplasty compared with anterior discectomy and fusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Eur Spine J. 2014;23:1115–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Upadhyaya CD, Wu JC, Trost G, et al. Analysis of the three united states food and drug administration investigational device exemption cervical arthroplasty trials. J Neurosurg Spine. 2012;16:216–28.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Wu AM, Xu H, Mullinix KP, et al. Minimum 4-year outcomes of cervical total disc arthroplasty versus fusion: a meta-analysis based on prospective randomized controlled trials. Medicine (Baltimore). 2015;94:e665.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Qureshi SA, McAnany S, Goz V, et al. Cost-effectiveness analysis: comparing single-level cervical disc replacement and single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: clinical article. J Neurosurg Spine. 2013;19:546–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Bydon M, Mathios D, Macki M, et al. Long-term patient outcomes after posterior cervical foraminotomy: an analysis of 151 cases. J Neurosurg Spine. 2014;21:727–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Skovrlj B, Gologorsky Y, Haque R, et al. Complications, outcomes, and need for fusion after minimally invasive posterior cervical foraminotomy and microdiscectomy. Spine J. 2014;14:2405–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Kwon YJ. Long-term clinical and radiologic outcomes of minimally invasive posterior cervical foraminotomy. J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2014;56:224–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  75. Faught RW, Church EW, Halpern CH, et al. Long-term quality of life after posterior cervical foraminotomy for radiculopathy. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2016;142:22–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Church EW, Halpern CH, Faught RW, et al. Cervical laminoforaminotomy for radiculopathy: symptomatic and functional outcomes in a large cohort with long-term follow-up. Surg Neurol Int. 2014;5:536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Mansfield HE, Canar WJ, Gerard CS, et al. Single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion versus minimally invasive posterior cervical foraminotomy for patients with cervical radiculopathy: a cost analysis. Neurosurg Focus. 2014;37, E9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Han Jo Kim.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Sravisht Iyer declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Han Jo Kim reports personal fees from Medtronic, Biomet, K2M, Stryker and Depuy, as well as grants from CSRS, outside the submitted work.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Cervical Injuries and Treatment

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Iyer, S., Kim, H.J. Cervical radiculopathy. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 9, 272–280 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12178-016-9349-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12178-016-9349-4

Keywords

Navigation