Graduation review for Prometheus #88
Conversation
| ### Document that it is being used successfully in production by at least three independent end users which, in the TOC’s judgement, are of adequate quality and scope. | ||
|
|
||
| * "Users" section of https://prometheus.io/ | ||
| * In-progress PR to add an `ADOPTERS.md` file: https://github.com/prometheus/prometheus/pull/3833/files |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
It's "USERS.md", but this is a nitpick.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The governance criteria and @caniszczyk suggested an ADOPTERS.md, so maybe it's best to update that in the linked PR instead.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@caniszczyk suggested both, but it seems ADOPTERS is the canonical place. @brian-brazil 's point that this specific repo might not be the best place remains, but I think we have consensus that it's fine to put somewhere.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I'd be for the docs repo (like the governance) unless we want to have per-repo user lists, but let's discuss that somewhere else :)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Isn't the users section on prometheus.io sufficient? In the long run, we probably want a separate section, as it will grow too much for the landing page, but we can keep it there indefinitely.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@beorn7 Going to comment on prometheus/docs#969 about that.
|
FYI: Graduation vote kicked off on the @cncf/toc mailing list! |
|
The vote for Prometheus to graduate has passed: https://www.cncf.io/announcement/2018/08/09/prometheus-graduates/ +1 binding TOC votes (9/9): Thank you to everyone who voted and contributed to Prometheus, it's been fun to help the project grow as part of the CNCF community. I personally appreciate the Prometheus community in joining CNCF in the early days as our 2nd project and helping us evolve as an open source foundation for the better. |
No description provided.