Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Reword informative prose in the Introduction and Scope sections #131

Merged
merged 2 commits into from Jan 4, 2018

Conversation

rdeltour
Copy link
Member

The proposed changes are not critical, but I think they slightly clarify the "format vs. rule" difference.


Describing how to test certain accessibility requirements will result in accessibility tests that are transparent with test results that are reproducible. The Accessibility Conformance Testing (ACT) Rules Format defines the requirements of these test descriptions, known as Accessibility Conformance Testing Rules (ACT Rules).


Scope {#scope}
==============

The ACT Rules Format scope is focused on the development of ACT Rules for the conformance testing of content created using web technologies, such as HTML, CSS, WAI-ARIA, SVG and more, including digital publishing. The ACT Rules Format, however, is designed to be technology agnostic, meaning it has no specific technology in mind. This also means that the ACT Rules Format could conceivably be used for other technologies.
The ACT Rules Format defined in this specification is focused on the description of test rules applicable to to content created using web technologies, such as HTML, CSS, WAI-ARIA, SVG and more, including digital publishing. The ACT Rules Format, however, is designed to be technology agnostic, meaning it has no specific technology in mind. This also means that the ACT Rules Format could conceivably be used for other technologies.
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The ACT Rules Format defined in this specification is focused on the description of rules applicable to content created using web technologies


Other accessibility requirements that may be applicable to web technologies should also be testable with ACT Rules. For example, the User Agent Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 is applicable to web-based user agents, for which ACT Rules could be developed, but other technologies can also be used to develop User Agents, which are not web-based. Because some accessibility requirements may be applicable to technologies other than web technologies, the ACT Rules Format may not be suitable for every part of these accessibility requirement.
Other accessibility requirements that may be applicable to web technologies would also typically be testable with ACT Rules. For example, as the User Agent Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 is applicable to web-based user agents, ACT Rules could be developed that target these requirements. However, as other technologies which are not web-based can also be used to develop User Agents, the ACT Rules Format would not necessarily be suitable to every part of the User Agent Accessibility Guidelines 2.0.
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Other accessibility requirements applicable to web technologies could also be testable with ACT Rules.
For example, ACT Rules could be developed to test the conformance of web-based user agents to the User Agent Accessibility Guidelines.
However, the ACT Rules Format would not necessarily be suitable to describe tests for the conformance of a non-web-based user agent.

@rdeltour
Copy link
Member Author

@maryjom I pushed the changes we just discussed at TPAC.

@moekraft
Copy link
Collaborator

From 11/30/17, fix grammar and spelling issues.

@WilcoFiers WilcoFiers merged commit 57bf25c into w3c:master Jan 4, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants