Details
-
Change Request
-
Resolution: Persuasive
-
Highest
-
US Da Vinci PAS (FHIR)
-
1.2.0-ballot [deprecated]
-
Financial Mgmt
-
STU
-
Use Cases and Overview
-
2.3.3
-
-
Bob Dieterle / Rachael Foerster : 10-0-1
-
Clarification
-
Non-substantive
Description
See sentence: "In the absence of CRD support by EHR or payer, other mechanisms such as consulting the payer's website and/or emailing or faxing the payer must be used."
The provider should not have to resort to manual methods to determine whether prior authorization is required. Without full implementation of all three guides (CRD, DTR, PAS), ROI will be low for providers if they have to exit EMR workflow for other steps. If payers don't support CRD/DTR, providers will not be motivated to use PAS – not enough value.
Across all three guides there are many references to solutions that are either antiquated or proprietary, which is not the point of having a standard. More consideration and expectation needs to be given to the implementation of all the guides in concert.
Attachments
Issue Links
- is voted on by
-
BALLOT-32562 Negative - Celine Lefebvre : 2022-May-FHIR IG PAS R2 STU
- Withdrawn
- mentioned in
-
Page Loading...