Details
-
Change Request
-
Resolution: Persuasive
-
Highest
-
US Da Vinci PAS (FHIR)
-
1.2.0-ballot [deprecated]
-
Financial Mgmt
-
STU
-
Use Cases and Overview
-
2.3.7
-
-
Bob Dieterle / Rachael Foerster : 10-0-1
-
Clarification
-
Non-substantive
Description
See list in section 2.3.7
#1 should not be an option. It is worrisome that a payer would be deem conformant with this IG by requesting additional information via FAX.
#4 is not clear – how would the provider know to resubmit? You need to spell out how the payer is going to tell the provider to resubmit and what additional info is needed.
To be conformant with the IG the supporting information SHOULD be requested in an automated way and within the same workflow (i.e. no fax/mail/proprietary solutions like portals).
Attachments
Issue Links
- is voted on by
-
BALLOT-32574 Negative - Celine Lefebvre : 2022-May-FHIR IG PAS R2 STU
- Withdrawn
- mentioned in
-
Page Loading...