Uploaded image for project: 'FHIR Specification Feedback'
  1. FHIR Specification Feedback
  2. FHIR-36618

comment on X12 vs. HL7 mechanisms for changing request

    XMLWordPrintableJSON

Details

    • Icon: Change Request Change Request
    • Resolution: Persuasive
    • Icon: Highest Highest
    • US Da Vinci PAS (FHIR)
    • 1.2.0-ballot [deprecated]
    • Financial Mgmt
    • STU
    • Formal Specification
    • 5.2.9
    • Hide

      We will remove section 5.2.9.2 Differential Request.

      If an intermediary is going to create an X12 Differential request, they can use the Full Request with the Cancelled and Changed extension to create the differential.

       

      Show
      We will remove section 5.2.9.2 Differential Request. If an intermediary is going to create an X12 Differential request, they can use the Full Request with the Cancelled and Changed extension to create the differential.  
    • Bob Dieterle / Rachael Foerster : 10-0-1
    • Clarification
    • Non-substantive

    Description

      See sentence "From an X12 perspective, only those items/attachments that are being added/cancelled/revised need to be present. From an HL7 perspective, resources are generally represented as a cohesive whole, not a set of deltas from a previous resource. This standard therefore provides two different mechanisms for representing the revised prior authorization request:"

      Question: Does this mean that people are going to be implementing in different ways? This seems very problematic.

      Attachments

        Activity

          People

            Unassigned Unassigned
            celine_lefebvre Celine Lefebvre
            Celine Lefebvre
            Watchers:
            3 Start watching this issue

            Dates

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: