Details
-
Change Request
-
Resolution: Persuasive
-
Highest
-
US Da Vinci PAS (FHIR)
-
1.2.0-ballot [deprecated]
-
Financial Mgmt
-
STU
-
Formal Specification
-
5.2.9
-
-
Bob Dieterle / Rachael Foerster : 10-0-1
-
Clarification
-
Non-substantive
Description
See sentence "From an X12 perspective, only those items/attachments that are being added/cancelled/revised need to be present. From an HL7 perspective, resources are generally represented as a cohesive whole, not a set of deltas from a previous resource. This standard therefore provides two different mechanisms for representing the revised prior authorization request:"
Question: Does this mean that people are going to be implementing in different ways? This seems very problematic.
Attachments
Issue Links
- is voted on by
-
BALLOT-32621 Negative - Celine Lefebvre : 2022-May-FHIR IG PAS R2 STU
- Withdrawn
- relates to
-
FHIR-36318 Need to clarify exactly when an updated request should be sent versus a new submission
- Duplicate
- mentioned in
-
Page Loading...