Back Investing with your eyes CIO insights from South America

Investing with your eyes: CIO insights from South America | Paul Moroz | Ep12

July 25, 2018 Print

Chief Investment Officer Paul Moroz continues to travel the world doing fundamental research for the global equity and the global small cap strategies. This episode reveals specific observations from his recent research trip to South America and New York City.

Highlights include:

  • How a company can use complexity as a competitive advantage
  • The concept of technological debt
  • Complex adaptive systems: the impact a butterfly’s wings in the U.S. can have on markets in Brazil

 

A transcript of this episode is available below, modified for a more enjoyable reading experience. For more posts exploring the ideas we talk about in the episode, check out our Related Reads links.


Transcript

1:10 – Start

1:40 – Investing with your eyes: Paul’s itinerary (Chile, Brazil, New York City)

3:05 – Chile: Brookfield Asset Management

  • What cemented our view of Brookfield’s competitive advantage: complexity and culture
  • Seeing the assets, understanding the assets, and meeting their people and finding out how they make decisions
  • Learnings from a tour of a Brookfield-owned toll road
    • Painting the picture of how complex it is to do what Brookfield does and the competitive advantage this provides:
      • The deal had to be done quickly
      • Regulation—they had to go to arbitration with the government over tariffs for the toll road
      • A bridge was damaged by a recent earthquake and had to be repaired immediately

7:30 – What Paul learned walking around downtown Santiago

  • Seeing an advertisement for an investment firm’s performance sparked key questions
    • Paul asked the CEO what it was about their investment team that can enable strong returns—he didn’t have a good answer
    • Paul’s insight: you can only control an input—e.g., culture, investment process—things you can “put in” that tends to improve performance

10:55 – Blind dates: Paul utilizes dinner to meet with various contacts

12:45 – Brazil

Investing with your eyes

  • Seeing the ways the world has changed
    • Paul noticed Robeco bank’s large real estate presence
      • In his opinion, they have way too much real estate because the internet has changed the game
      • Putting it into perspective, Banco Santander in Santiago has gone a different way in trying to utilize real estate. Enter: high end coffee shops
      • Paul’s view: there is probably some opportunities to remove some real estate on many banks’ income statements

15:10 – Connecting the themes: NYC

Meeting with CEO of DBS bank (Singapore), held in Mawer’s global equity and international equity strategies and talking about what they’re doing about technology

  • 5 years ago, they were very concerned about what Alibaba (Chinese e-commerce) was doing around technology
  • DBS saw Alibaba as a significant threat—potential for them to make inroads into financial products/banking
  • If DBS was going to stay relevant, they would have to change what they were doing
  • DBS changed the core culture and technological architecture which amounts to progress and impact

This very much relates to seeing legacy bank branches in South America and realizing that some companies are going to be ahead of the curve in terms of technology, and some will not.

16:50 – As a research team, discussing more and more the concept of technical debt

  • Companies have to invest in technology in some shape or form and it is not always clear from looking at a financial statement—we need to dig in and have conversations and ask questions (scuttlebutt)

19:34 – Is there a sense of urgency around Amazon as a potential disrupter to North American banks?

20:41 – Performing scuttlebutt in a pharmacy in Sao Paulo

  • Seeing what products are selling
  • How many products are private label
  • How many cosmetics do they sell
  • The Disneyland queue effect: How is the store structured to encourage purchases

23:00—Chaos theory: interconnection between financial markets

  • Bond yields have been increasing in the U.S.
  • Expectation that bond yields will continue to increase because the economy is strong has seemed to have resulted in a strong U.S. dollar
  • Therefore, currencies such as the Brazilian real have been depreciating against the U.S. dollar
  • This in combination with the price of oil recovering has led to higher fuel costs in Brazil which eats into truckers’ profits—the truckers decided to go on strike and block roads
  • So…increasing bond yields in the U.S. led to Paul almost not being able to leave Brazil!

26:46 – Why our CIO goes on research trips: leading by example and the role of the “generalist” analyst at Mawer

27:55 – One Mawer thought: book Paul brought on his trip


Related Reads


How to subscribe

The podcast is available to listen and subscribe through any of the following platforms:

Subscribe to Art of Boring to receive email notifications when a new episode is available, as well as other insights through our blog and quarterly updates.


Have feedback?

If you enjoyed this episode, feel free to leave a review on iTunes, which will help more people discover the Be Boring. Make Money.™ philosophy. 

If you have any questions, comments, or suggestions about the podcast, please email podcast@mawer.com.


This blog and its contents, including references to specific securities,  are for informational purposes only. Information relating to investment approaches or individual investments should not be construed as advice or endorsement. Any views expressed in this blog were prepared based upon the information available at the time and are subject to change. All information is subject to possible correction. In no event shall Mawer Investment Management Ltd. be liable for any damages arising out of, or in any way connected with, the use or inability to use this blog appropriately.

References to specific securities are presented for informational purposes only, and should not be considered recommendations to buy or sell any security, neither is it implied that they have been or will be profitable.