Next Article in Journal
Simulating the Evolution of Da Anglong Glacier, Western Tibetan Plateau over the 21st Century
Previous Article in Journal
Simulation of Denitrification Process of Calcium Nitrate Combined with Low Oxygen Aeration Based on Double Logarithm Mode
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Study of the Effect of Leucine on Calcium Carbonate Precipitation in a Circular Economy Perspective

by
Giuseppe Mazziotti di Celso
1,
Marina Prisciandaro
2,*,
Despina Karatza
3,
Dino Musmarra
3 and
Amedeo Lancia
4
1
Faculty of Bioscience, Agri-Food and Environmental Technologies, University of Teramo, 64100 Teramo, Italy
2
Department of Industrial and Information Engineering and of Economics, University of L’Aquila, 67100 L’Aquila, Italy
3
Department of Engineering, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, 81031 Aversa, Italy
4
Department of Chemical, Materials and Production Engineering, University Federico II of Naples, 80125 Napoli, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Water 2022, 14(2), 270; https://doi.org/10.3390/w14020270
Submission received: 3 December 2021 / Revised: 2 January 2022 / Accepted: 13 January 2022 / Published: 17 January 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Wastewater Treatment and Reuse)

Abstract

:
This paper studies the crystallization of calcium carbonate in the presence of leucine—a green additive. The effect of leucine on calcium carbonate precipitation kinetic is particularly interesting since CaCO3 is a valuable product worthy to be recovered from industrial liquid wastes (e.g., desalination brines) in the circular economy approach. Experiments have been performed in a laboratory scale plant with a supersaturation range which spams from 2 to 120 and two different leucine concentration (0.520 × 10−3 and 1.041 × 10−3 mol/L). Results obtained have been compared with previous published ones, carried out without any additives. From the measurements of induction times for calcium carbonate nucleation, it was established that in solution, the leucine favors the precipitation of calcium carbonate, so it can be considered a promoter in calcium carbonate crystallization and this behavior enhances when raising its concentration in solution. Interfacial tension was determined for both leucine concentration levels, and the values obtained are in the range 51–84 mJ/m2.

1. Introduction

Calcium carbonate crystallization plays a major role in several processes, where it can be a desired presence or an unwanted occurrence. On the one hand, calcium carbonate, together with calcium sulphate, is the main cause of scales on process equipment, like reverse osmosis membranes or multiple effect evaporators in desalination plants, thereby decreasing process efficiency [1,2]. On the other hand, precipitated calcium carbonate is a valuable product used mainly as a filler product in many industries such as paper, rubber, paint, textile, plastic, sealant, alloy, catalyst, cosmetic, pharmaceutical and the food industry [3,4,5]. In addition, new composites made of biopolymers and calcium carbonate are conquering market shares in recent years, due to their unique properties, applications and non-toxicity [6]. Calcium carbonate can be recovered also from calcium-rich effluents of different production processes by CO2 mineral carbonation [7]. This is particularly worthwhile as mineral carbonation of CO2 is one of the carbon capture and utilization (CCU) technologies that is thermodynamically favored and cheap; therefore, it is suitable for large-scale commercialization. This route ensures effective recycling of both gaseous CO2 and liquid industrial waste, turning CO2 into a final product of industrial interest, which is in line with a circular economy approach [8]. An industrial example is the post-distillation liquid from the Solvay Process (production of sodium carbonate, soda-ash), that is a Ca-rich waste [9]; if not correctly disposed of, this waste is responsible for the strong salinity of nearby groundwater with calcium chloride pollution of natural water reservoirs and soil [10]. Instead, this liquid waste can be used for CaCO3 precipitation with CO2 utilization [11]. Other examples of wastes that can be used to produce calcium carbonate via carbonation are paper sludge ash from paper manufacturing and oil shale ash [10] and desalination brines. As pointed out by the recent review by Ogunbiyi and coworkers [12], the recovery of valuable minerals among which CaCO3 from desalination brines is a key feature in brine management that is gaining increasing interest in scientific literature. This because CaCO3 recovery processes from brines are methods of limiting CO2 emissions or removing CO2 from desalination plants [13].
In those cases, when carbonate is the desired product of the process, it may be crucial to have the possibility of producing CaCO3 with the desired characteristics, such as purity, water content, particle size and shape and polymorphic form [6].
In order to obtain CaCO3 crystals with the preferred features and to promote crystallization, the addition of additives in a supersaturated solution is a common technique, usually employed to modify and influence nucleation and crystal growth mechanisms. The selection of the proper additive depends upon the water chemistry and the system design [14]. Several compounds have been tested for their ability to favor calcium carbonate precipitation, such as EDTA and ZnCl2 [15], polyacrylic acid (PAA) [16,17,18], Sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) [19] and other substances. The article by Jimoh and coworkers [4] gives an exhaustive state of the art of the different additives on precipitated calcium carbonate (PCC) syntheses, where PCC is that produced in a precipitation reaction by reacting aqueous calcium hydroxide, Ca(OH)2 with carbon dioxide (CO2) (“carbonation”). Nowadays, more and more research is aimed at finding alternatives, the so called “green calcium carbonate scaling inhibitors” especially for CaCO3 production in food and drug industrial applications. An additive may be defined as a green if it is non-toxic, non-bioaccumulating and biodegradable. For example, in the last years, lots of ecological additives have been studied, like plant extracts. They represent an interesting solution because they are green and environment-friendly, and they can be extracted easily. A literature survey has shown that leucine had a profound effect on the crystallization behavior and especially on the morphology of CaCO3 crystals [20]. Even if there is a vast literature that studies the influence of various amino acids on carbonate precipitation [21,22,23,24], however, the effect of such a molecule on both the nature of nucleation (homogeneous or heterogeneous mechanism) together with growth kinetics of CaCO3 has been poorly studied so far; the only paper found on the effect of leucine on carbonate growth kinetic is the study by Malkaj and coworkers [25], who found that in heterogeneous nucleation conditions, leucine had no effect on the growth mechanism. Again, only an effect on the morphology and the particle size of the CaCO3 was observed. On the contrary, leucine had proved to have a strong effect on the crystal growth rates of hydroxyapatite (HAP), that decreased markedly due to adsorption of leucine and subsequent blocking of the active growth sites onto the surface of the HAP crystals [26]. The effect of this natural amino acid on nucleation and crystal growth on calcium carbonate would be extremely interesting also due to its characteristics that meet the requirements for applications in the food and beverage industries [27,28].
The analysis of the literature has thus indicated the need of deepening the effect of the natural additive leucine on nucleation and crystal growth on calcium carbonate precipitation via the estimation of thermodynamic parameters, such as the interfacial tension. This parameter, estimated through the measurement of induction times for the nucleation, would allow to verify if the addition of leucine in solution could accelerate the precipitation of calcium carbonate so as to allow a correct/suitable use of the additive in its industrial applications.
The generally accepted classical laws of crystallization affirm that the formation of calcium carbonate crystals occurs through the formation of nuclei (nucleation) in a supersaturated solution, followed, or accompanied by crystal growth (growth). An additive in a supersaturated solution may affect one or both these mechanisms. According to Mersmann [29], the exact mode of operation of these substances at the molecular level is still, by and large, obscure. Any theory trying to explain the role played by these molecules must consider the structural parameters of the growing crystals, their morphologies and the stereochemistry of the impurities. However, as shown in detail by other studies by the same research group [30], the effect of different additives on nucleation kinetics can be carried out by evaluating the induction period tind, defined as the time that elapses between the onset of supersaturation and the first changes in the system’s physical properties due to the formation of a solid phase [31]. Therefore, with experiments in the presence and in the absence of the additive, it is possible to define the promoting effect of the selected additive if it proves itself able to decrease the induction time for nucleation.
In this paper, the effect of leucine addition on calcium carbonate crystallization from solution is studied through the measure of induction time for nucleation, with the experimental technique set up by this research group [32]. As shown by Mullin [33] and Söhnel and Garside [34], tind dependence on supersaturation allows the determination of the interfacial tension between crystals and the surrounding solution. Therefore, the value of interfacial tension of calcium carbonate crystals is estimated, in the presence and in the absence of leucine.

2. Materials and Methods

The experimental apparatus is a laboratory scale plant, provided with a jacketed stirred reactor and an optical device. It is sketched in Figure 1 and a detailed description of the apparatus and the related optical technique used for the measurement of the induction time for nucleation is available elsewhere [32].
To prepare the calcium carbonate supersaturated solution to fill in the stirring reactor, three reagents have been mixed together with bi-distillate water: calcium chloride dihydrate (CaCl2·2H2O), sodium hydrogen carbonate (NaHCO3) (both from Applichem, Darmstadt, Germany) and leucine (L-leucine—Merck LifeScience, Darmstadt, Germany). EDTA titrimetric method was used to measure Ca2+ ions concentration in reagent solution.
Before filling in the reactor, the solution was micro-filtered, to separate foreign substances. All experimental runs have been performed at room temperature ( T = 25   ° C ). Different values of CaCl2·2H2O and NaHCO3 have been used, ranging from 2 to 60 mol/m3, while two concentrations of leucine 0.520 × 10−3 and 1.041 × 10−3 mol/L have been selected.
Experimental runs have been carried out at room temperature ( T = 25   ° C ), with supersaturation ratio values ranging from 2 to 120.
Considering the liquid–solid equilibrium between the species in solution ( Ca 2 + and CO 3 2 ions) and the precipitate calcium carbonate:
Ca 2 + + CO 3 2 = CaCO 3
the supersaturation ratio is computed by the following equation:
S = a C a 2 + a C O 3 2 K p s
where
  • a C a 2 + = calcium ion activity
  • a C O 3 2 = carbonate ion activity
  • K p s = solubility product of calcium carbonate.
The activity ( a ) of each ion may be calculated by multiplying the molality ( m ) by the activity coefficient (γ), respectively, which can be finally achieved from modified Deybe–Hückel equation [35] while Kps depends on the temperature and may be calculated by the following equation, valid for calcite [36]:
p K p s = 0.001183   T + 8.03  
All concentrations have been calculated accounting for all the equilibria that settle in the aqueous solution, as described in the Appendix A.
Samples of the precipitated solid were analyzed with XRD (Malvern PANalytical, Malvern, UK), and the analysis confirmed that it was mainly made of calcite.

3. Results and Discussion

To study the effect of leucine addition on calcium carbonate nucleation, two experimental series for the induction time measurement have been performed at different leucine concentrations, keeping the temperature constant at T = 25   ° C and varying the supersaturation ratio S. The first experimental series has been carried out at a leucine concentration ( c L E U ) equal to 0.520 × 10−3 M, the second one at c L E U = 1.041 × 10−3 M. The experiments are reported in the following Figure 2, where induction times are plotted as a function of supersaturation ratios for two leucine levels. As can be observed, for each curve at a fixed leucine concentration, the induction times decrease with increasing of the supersaturation ratio. This is expected, since a higher ion concentration in solution results in a faster solid phase formation [33]. With increasing leucine concentration, passing from 0.520 × 10−3 M (rhombuses) to 1.041 × 10−3 M (circles), the induction times decrease and the curve moves downwards. Leucine seems to behave as a promoter for CaCO3 crystallization. This behavior is likely due to the fact that when leucine is added in solution, the distance between the equilibrium and the metastable curves decreases, reducing the so-called metastable zone. This is an advantage if the target is to recover calcium carbonate with specific characteristics in terms of particle size, purity, shape and polymorphic form. The promotion for CaCO3 crystallization can be enhanced, as shown by the curves reported in Figure 2, if higher leucine concentration is added to the solution, which leads to lower induction times at the same supersaturation ratio.
To strengthen this experimental observation, experimental results have been compared with those obtained by the same research group in the absence of any additive [37,38]. The comparison, at fixed additive concentration (leucine) of 0.520 × 10−3 M, is shown in Figure 3. The figure shows the tind values measured in presence of leucine (rhombuses), at the same concentration in solution, are lower than the induction times values obtained in the absence of any additives (triangles). This confirms the capacity of leucine to act as a promoter for calcium carbonate nucleation.
Experimental results shown in Figure 2 and Figure 3 have been fitted using the following equation:
t i n d = k S r
where the induction time ( t i n d ) and the supersaturation ratio ( S ) are linked together by means of two empirical constants (k, r), that have been evaluated and reported in Table 1 for both concentrations of leucine investigated and in the case of no additive in solution computed in a previous paper [39].
Subsequently, induction time measurements as a function of supersaturation ratio have been used to estimate the interfacial tension between CaCO3 crystals and surrounding solution. The linearization of experimental results has been computed, according to the following equation derived from the classical crystallization theory [33]:
log t i n d = C N + D N T 3 log S 2
where
  • C N = empirical constant
  • T = absolute temperature, K
  • S = supersaturation ratio
    D N = β × γ s l 3 × V m 2 × N A × f ϕ 2.3 R 3 ν 2
  • β = shape factor.
  • γ s l = interfacial tension, J / m 2 .
  • V m = molar volume, m 3 / mol .
  • N A = Avogadro number, L / mol .
  • f ϕ = correction factor ( < 1 heterog. nucl. = 1 homog. nucl.).
  • R = gas constant, J / mol   K .
  • ν = number of ions.
As reported in the literature for calcium carbonate crystallization [33], it is possible to say that nucleation is the key phase to control the induction time value ( t n t g , t n = nucleation time, t g = growth time). Therefore, experimental results can be linearized in the two cases investigated using Equation (5), with different leucine concentrations. The results of linearization have been reported in Figure 4 for leucine concentration 0.520 × 10−3 M.
It is well visible that tind values belong to two different groups: the points obtained at higher supersaturation ratio values (left side of the plot) are representative of the homogeneous nucleation mechanism, and thus can be used for interfacial tension (γsl) determination; the other points (at lower S, right side of the plot), belong to the heterogeneous nucleation region. From the slope of solely homogeneous data, the value of γ s l = 84.05   mJ / m 2 is estimated.
When the concentration of leucine is low (0.520 × 10−3 M) the transition zone is still well defined, both with the homogeneous and heterogeneous nucleation shown. This behavior was somehow expected. The heterogeneous nucleation is typical of low supersaturation values: when the additive is a promoter, like leucine, in the region of low supersaturation values, induction time can be easily investigated by the acquisition system, as the formation of the first crystalline nuclei to appear is still very rapid.
In Figure 5, the same information as Figure 4 is reported with the increased leucine concentration (1.041 × 10−3 M). Also in this case, the transition zone can be evaluated, and the mechanism involving homogeneous nucleation was exclusively used for the estimation of interfacial tension data [39]. As can be noted, the transition region between homogeneous and heterogeneous nucleation for higher leucine concentration (1.041 × 10−3 M), shift towards right (at higher 1/(logS)−2 levels); that is, the transition occurs at lower supersaturation levels. This behavior can be explained as follows: at higher leucine concentration, also at low supersaturation values, induction times are very short, as confirmed by the curve reported in Figure 2. This implies a rapid nucleation of a large number of crystals, which in a few seconds, makes the whole CaCO3 to precipitate, as a consequence of the extremely high rate of crystal precipitation triggered by the unavoidably foreign substances in solution (heterogeneous conditions).
As can be seen, with increasing leucine concentrations, interfacial tension decreases, which confirms that the formation of CaCO3 nuclei is faster in the presence of a higher leucine concentration. The table also shows that interfacial tension γsl in the absence of any additive is higher than the case in which a promoter is added in solution.
Finally, for both leucine concentrations interfacial tension has been estimated and the computed values have been reported in Table 2.

4. Conclusions

In this paper, the effect of leucine on the induction time and the nucleation mechanisms of calcium carbonate crystallization has been studied. Two different concentrations of leucine in solution have been investigated, and the experimental runs, compared with previously published results with no additive, have shown that leucine is a promoter for CaCO3 precipitation, and this behavior increases, if its concentration grows from 0.520 × 10−3 M to 1.041 × 10−3 M. In both cases, the nucleation mechanisms were investigated: a twofold kind of nucleation (homogeneous/heterogeneous) was detected for a leucine concentration equal to 0.520 × 10−3 M, while homogeneous nucleation only was individuated for a leucine concentration equal to 1.041 × 10−3 M. The values of interfacial tension were estimated, showing that they increase along with the leucine concentration, confirming its nature of promoting additive. The obtained results are particularly relevant when calcium carbonate is precipitated from the post-distillation waste solution generated, as for example, in the Solvay process, or when calcium carbonate, being a sparingly soluble salt, is to be precipitated to reduce the risk of RO membrane scaling and damage in RO desalination plants, or at least recovered from desalination brines. In each of the abovementioned applications, CaCO3 precipitation in the presence of leucine is an interesting approach to waste management in the view of a circular economy. Moreover, the leucine addiction may expedite the CaCO3 formation, allowing its recovery also when calcium carbonate is to be used in processes where no pollutant additive may be allowable, as in the field of pharmaceutical and food industries.

Author Contributions

Resources, A.L.; conceptualization M.P. and D.M.; investigation D.K.; data curation G.M.d.C. and D.M.; software G.M.d.C.; supervision A.L. and D.K.; writing—review and editing M.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Appendix A

In this paper, equilibria in solutions have been calculated according to the following equations:
H 2 CO 3 K 1 HCO 3 + H +
HCO 3 K 2 CO 3 2 + H +
HCO 3 Na = H 2 CO 3 + HCO 3 + CO 3 2
H 2 O K W H + + OH
C 6 H 13 NO 2 K L 1 C 6 H 12 NO 2 + H +
C 6 H 12 NO 2 K L 2 C 6 H 11 NO 2 2 + H +
C 6 H 13 NO 2 = C 6 H 13 NO 2 + C 6 H 12 NO 2 + C 6 H 11 NO 2 2
Na + + 2 Ca 2 + + H + OH HCO 3 2 CO 3 2 Cl C 6 H 12 NO 2 C 6 H 11 NO 2 2 = 0
In Table A1, the dissociation constants computed at room temperature have been reported, while Table A2 shows the molarity of salts in solution, molarity of Ca 2 + , CO 3 2 , their activity coefficient and supersaturation ratio ( S ) for some experimental runs, in the case of 0.520 × 10 3   M leucine added in solution.
Table A1. Dissociation constants.
Table A1. Dissociation constants.
K1K2KWKL1KL2
4.45 × 10−74.69 × 10−111 × 10−147.41 × 10−41.75 × 10−5
Table A2. Activities and supersaturation in solution.
Table A2. Activities and supersaturation in solution.
Salts (M)Ca2+ (M)CO32− (M) γ C a 2 + γ C O 3 2 K p s S
0.011500.011502.29 × 10−50.43690.43695.22 × 10−99.62
0.015980.015984.53 × 10−50.38860.38864.54 × 10−924.04
0.028700.028701.29 × 10−40.30630.30634.57 × 10−976.26
Where
  • K 1 ,   K 2 are the dissociation constants of carbonic acid
  • K W , is the dissociation constant of water
  • K L 1 ,   K L 2 are the dissociation constants of leucine
  • K p s is the solubility product, evaluated using Equation (3)
  • γ C a 2 + ,   γ C O 3 2 are the activity coefficients of Ca 2 + and CO 3 2 .
Supersaturation values shown in Table A2 have been computed solving Equation (2), for particular experimental runs, in the case of different concentrations of leucine ( 0.520 × 10 3   M and 1.041 × 10 3   M ) added in solution. Activity coefficients as a function of ionic strength for both calcium and carbonate have been computed using the extended Debye–Hückel model [34]:
log γ J = A z J 2 F I 1 + a F I b F I
  • z J = the charge of J species,
  • F I = ionic strength ( mol / dm 3 ) of the solution
  • a = 1 , constant ( dm 3 / 2 / mol 1 / 2 )
  • b = 0.01 , constant ( dm 3 / mol )
  • A = constant ( dm 3 / 2 / mol 1 / 2 ) which is a function of the temperature A = 1.82 × 10 6 ε T 3 / 2
  • T = absolute temperature ( K )
  • ε = dielectric constant of water
  • By means of the following equation, the ionic strength can be calculated:
    F I = 1 2 j = 1 n c J z J 2
  • c J = concentration of J species ( mol / dm 3 ).

References

  1. Zhao, J.; Wang, M.; Lababidi, H.M.; Al-Adwani, H.; Gleason, K.K. A review of heterogeneous nucleation of calcium carbonate and control strategies for scale formation in multi-stage flash (MSF) desalination plants. Desalination 2018, 442, 75–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Hoek, E.M.; Jassby, D.; Kaner, R.B.; Wu, J.; Wang, J.; Liu, Y.; Rao, U. Sustainable Desalination and Water Reuse; Morgan & Claypool Publishers: Williston, VT, USA, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  3. Erdogan, N.; Eken, H.A. Precipitated calcium carbonate production, synthesis and properties. Phys. Probl. Min. Process. 2017, 53, 57–68. [Google Scholar]
  4. Jimoh, O.A.; Ariffin, K.S.; Bin Hussin, H.; Temitope, A.E. Synthesis of precipitated calcium carbonate: A review. Carbonates Evaporites 2018, 33, 331–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Xu, Y.; Ye, J.; Zhou, D.; Su, L. Research progress on applications of calcium derived from marine organisms. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 18425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Declet, A.; Reyes, E.; Suarez, O.M. Calcium carbonate precipitation: A review of the carbonate crystallization process and applications in bioinspired composites. Rev. Adv. Mater. Sci. 2016, 44, 87–107. [Google Scholar]
  7. Yadav, V.K.; Yadav, K.K.; Cabral-Pinto, M.M.S.; Choudhary, N.; Gnanamoorthy, G.; Tirth, V.; Prasad, S.; Khan, A.H.; Islam, S.; Khan, N.A. The Processing of Calcium Rich Agricultural and Industrial Waste for Recovery of Calcium Carbonate and Calcium Oxide and Their Application for Environmental Cleanup: A Review. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 4212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Czaplicka, N.; Konopacka-Łyskawa, D. Utilization of Gaseous Carbon Dioxide and Industrial Ca-Rich Waste for Calcium Carbonate Precipitation: A Review. Energies 2020, 13, 6239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Czaplicka, N.; Konopacka-Łyskawa, D.; Lewandowska, P.; Łapiński, M.; Bray, R. Influence of selected CO2 absorption promoters on the characteristics of calcium carbonate particles produced by carbonation of the post-distillation liquid from the Solvay process. Powder Technol. 2021, 391, 432–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Chang, R.; Kim, S.; Lee, S.; Choi, S.; Kim, M.; Park, Y. Calcium Carbonate Precipitation for CO2 Storage and Utilization: A Review of the Carbonate Crystallization and Polymorphism. Front. Energy Res. 2017, 10, 5–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Bang, J.-H.; Yoo, Y.; Lee, S.-W.; Song, K.; Chae, S. CO2 Mineralization Using Brine Discharged from a Seawater Desalination Plant. Minerals 2017, 7, 207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Ogunbiyi, O.; Saththasivam, J.; Al-Masri, D.; Manawi, Y.; Lawler, J.; Zhang, X.; Liu, Z. Sustainable brine management from the perspectives of water, energy and mineral recovery: A comprehensive review. Desalination 2021, 513, 115055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Bang, J.H.; Chae, S.C.; Lee, S.W.; Kim, J.W.; Song, K.; Kim, J.; Kim, W. Sequential carbonate mineralization of desalination brine for CO2 emission reduction. J. CO2 Util. 2019, 33, 427–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Amjad, Z. Scale inhibition in desalination applications: An overview. In Corrosion 96; NACE-96-230; OnePetro: Richardson, TX, USA, 1996. [Google Scholar]
  15. Xiang, L.; Xiang, Y.; Wang, Z.G.; Jin, Y. Influence of chemical additives on the formation of super-fine calcium carbonate. Powder Technol. 2002, 126, 129–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Mantilaka, M.M.; Karunaratne, D.G.; Rajapakse, R.M.; Pitawala, H.M. Precipitated calcium carbonate/poly(methyl methacrylate) nanocomposite using dolomite. Synth. Charact. Prop. 2013, 235, 628–632. [Google Scholar]
  17. Cai, G.-B.; Zhao, G.-X.; Wang, X.-K.; Yu, S.-H. Synthesis of polyacrylic acid stabilized amorphous calcium carbonate nanoparticles and their application for removal of toxic heavy metal ions in water. J. Phys. Chem. C 2010, 114, 12948–12954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Hwang, D.J.; Yu, Y.H.; Baek, C.S.; Lee, G.M.; Cho, K.H.; Ahn, J.W.; Han, C.; Lee, J.D. Preparation of high purity PCC from medium- and low-grade limestones using the strongly acidic cation exchange resin. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2015, 30, 309–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Szczes, A.; Chibowski, E.; Hołysz, L. Influence of ionic surfactants on the properties of freshly precipitated calcium carbonate. Colloids Surf A 2007, 297, 14–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Euliss, L.E.; Bartl, M.H.; Stucky, G.D. Control of calcium carbonate crystallization utilizing amphiphilic block copolypeptides. J. Cryst. Growth 2006, 286, 424–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Picker, A.; Kellermeier, M.; Seto, J.; Gebauer, D.; Cölfen, H. The multiple effect of amino acids on the early stages of calcium carbonate crystallization. Z. Krist. Cryst. Miner. 2012, 227, 744–757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Thompson, S.P.; Parker, J.E.; Street, S.R.; Tang, C.C. Morphological templating of metastable calcium carbonates by the amino acid leucine. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2010, 286, 012030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Borukhin, S.; Bloch, L.; Radlauer, T.; Hill, A.H.; Fitch, A.N.; Pokroy, B. Screening the incorporation of amino acids an inorganic crystalline host: The case of calcite. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2012, 22, 4216–4224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Christoph, B.; Seto, J. Single amino acids as additives modulating CaCO3 mineralization. Adv. Top. Biominer. 2012, 17, 33–48. [Google Scholar]
  25. Malkaj, P.; Kanakis, I.; Dalas, E. The effect of leucine on the crystal growth of calcium carbonate. J. Cryst. Growth 2004, 266, 533–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Dalas, E.; Malkaj, P.; Vasileiou, Z.; Kanellopoulou, D.G. The effect of Leucine on the crystal growth of calcium phosphate. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 2008, 19, 277–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Chaussemier, M.; Pourmohtasham, E.; Gelus, D.; Pécoul, N.; Perrot, H.; Lédion, J.; Cheap-Charpentier, H.; Horner, H.O. State of art of natural inhibitors of calcium carbonate scaling. A review article. Desalination 2015, 356, 47–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Hasson, D.; Shemer, H.; Sher, A. State of the art of friendly “green” scale control inhibitors: A review article. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2011, 50, 7601–7607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Mersmann, A. Crystallization Technology Handbook; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  30. Prisciandaro, M.; Olivieri, E.; Lancia, A.D. PBTC as an Antiscalant for Gypsum Precipitation: Interfacial Tension and Activation Energy Estimation. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2012, 51, 12844–12851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Söhnel, O.; Mullin, J.W. Interpretation of crystallization induction periods. J. Coll. Int. Sci. 1988, 123, 43–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Lancia, A.; Musmarra, D.; Prisciandaro, M. Measuring induction period for calcium sulfate dihydrate precipitation. AIChE J. 1999, 45, 390–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Mullin, J.W. Crystallization, 4th ed.; Butterworth-Heinemann, Ltd.: Oxford, UK, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  34. Söhnel, O.; Garside, J. Precipitation; Butterworth-Heinemann, Ltd.: Oxford, UK, 1992. [Google Scholar]
  35. Stumm, W.; Morgan, J.J. Aquatic Chemistry: Chemical Equilibria and Rates in Natural Waters, 3rd ed.; Wiley & Sons: New York, NY, USA, 1995. [Google Scholar]
  36. Larson, T.E.; Buswell, A.M. Calcium Carbonate Saturation Index and Alkalinity Interpretations. J. Am. Water Works Ass. 1942, 34, 1667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Di Celso, G.M.; Prisciandaro, M.; Karatza, D.; Lancia, A.; Musmarra, D. Salt scales on process equipment: Measurement of the induction time for calcium carbonate nucleation. Can. J. Chem. Eng. 2017, 95, 1671–1675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Di Celso, G.M.; Prisciandaro, M.; Karatza, D.; Lancia, A.; Musmarra, D. Calcium carbonate scales on process equipment: A measure of the induction time for nucleation. Desalination Water Treat. 2017, 69, 173–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Prisciandaro, M.; Di Celso, G.M.; Lancia, A.; Musmarra, D.; Karatza, D. Citric acid as a green additive to retard calcium carbonate scales on process equipment. Can. J. Chem. Eng. 2020, 98, 1973–1979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Experimental apparatus.
Figure 1. Experimental apparatus.
Water 14 00270 g001
Figure 2. Induction time for CaCO3 nucleation as a function of supersaturation ratio at different leucine concentrations.
Figure 2. Induction time for CaCO3 nucleation as a function of supersaturation ratio at different leucine concentrations.
Water 14 00270 g002
Figure 3. Induction time for CaCO3 nucleation as a function of supersaturation ratio with leucine and without any additive.
Figure 3. Induction time for CaCO3 nucleation as a function of supersaturation ratio with leucine and without any additive.
Water 14 00270 g003
Figure 4. Induction period as a function of the inverse of supersaturation ratio: homogeneous and heterogeneous nucleation with leucine ( c L E U = 0.520 × 10−3 M).
Figure 4. Induction period as a function of the inverse of supersaturation ratio: homogeneous and heterogeneous nucleation with leucine ( c L E U = 0.520 × 10−3 M).
Water 14 00270 g004
Figure 5. Induction period as a function of the inverse of supersaturation ratio: homogeneous nucleation with leucine ( c L E U = 1.041 × 10−3 M).
Figure 5. Induction period as a function of the inverse of supersaturation ratio: homogeneous nucleation with leucine ( c L E U = 1.041 × 10−3 M).
Water 14 00270 g005
Table 1. Empirical constants for all experimental runs.
Table 1. Empirical constants for all experimental runs.
Leucine (M) k r R2
01.08 × 1062.110.991
0.520 × 10−36.43 × 1031.170.998
1.041 × 10−32.25 × 1031.050.993
Table 2. Interfacial tension as a function of additive concentration.
Table 2. Interfacial tension as a function of additive concentration.
Additive
Concentration (M)
Interfacial Tension
γ s l   m J / m 2
0109.3
0.520 × 10−384.05
1.041 × 10−368.90
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mazziotti di Celso, G.; Prisciandaro, M.; Karatza, D.; Musmarra, D.; Lancia, A. Study of the Effect of Leucine on Calcium Carbonate Precipitation in a Circular Economy Perspective. Water 2022, 14, 270. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14020270

AMA Style

Mazziotti di Celso G, Prisciandaro M, Karatza D, Musmarra D, Lancia A. Study of the Effect of Leucine on Calcium Carbonate Precipitation in a Circular Economy Perspective. Water. 2022; 14(2):270. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14020270

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mazziotti di Celso, Giuseppe, Marina Prisciandaro, Despina Karatza, Dino Musmarra, and Amedeo Lancia. 2022. "Study of the Effect of Leucine on Calcium Carbonate Precipitation in a Circular Economy Perspective" Water 14, no. 2: 270. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14020270

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop