Next Article in Journal
Rainfall-Runoff Time Lags from Saltwater Interface Interactions in Atlantic Coastal Plain Basins
Next Article in Special Issue
Focal Mechanisms and Stress Field Characteristics of Microearthquakes in Baihetan Reservoir in the Downstream Area of Jinsha River
Previous Article in Journal
The Regulating Role of Meteorology in the Wetland-Air CO2 Fluxes at the Largest Shallow Grass-Type Lake on the North China Plain
Previous Article in Special Issue
Risk Assessment of Dike Based on Risk Chain Model and Fuzzy Influence Diagram
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Study on the Influence of Water Level on Earth Dam Reinforced by Cut-Off Wall: A Case Study in Wujing Reservoir

1
Jiangxi Hydraulic Safety Engineering Technology Research Center, Jiangxi Academy of Water Science and Engineering, Nanchang 330029, China
2
State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan 330029, China
3
School of Water Conservancy Engineering, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China
4
School of Infrastructure Engineering, Nanchang University, Nanchang 330031, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Water 2023, 15(1), 140; https://doi.org/10.3390/w15010140
Submission received: 26 September 2022 / Revised: 12 December 2022 / Accepted: 25 December 2022 / Published: 30 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Safety Evaluation of Dam and Geotechnical Engineering)

Abstract

:
The construction of a cut-off wall is a common reinforcement method for earth rock dams. At present, compared with the in-depth study on homogeneous earth dams, more and more attention is being paid to the stability and deformation of earth dams strengthened by a concrete cut-off wall. In this study, aiming at the Wujing project of the earth dam strengthened by cut-off wall, the influence of the water level rise and fall on the stability of the dam slope, the deformation of the dam body, and the crack width on dam crest were analyzed by numerical calculation and in situ measurement. The analysis results show that when the reservoir encounters a sudden drawdown, the safety factor of the dam slope decreases sharply. The faster the sudden drawdown, the faster the safety factor decreases. When the reservoir water level rises, the dam’s horizontal displacement shifts to the upstream direction, and the change of horizontal displacement of the downstream slope is significantly larger than that at the measuring point of the upstream slope. The water level of the reservoir rises, and the surface of the dam body rises, and the fluctuation of settlement deformation shows that the upstream side is larger than the downstream side, especially during the period of abrupt change in the reservoir water level. The longitudinal cracks on the dam crest show a tendency of shrinkage when the reservoir water level rises, and opening decreases with the decrease of deformation gradient increment and increases with the increase of gradient increment.

1. Introduction

Most of the reservoir earth rock dam projects in China were built in the 1960s–1970s. Due to the limitations of technical and historical conditions at that time, there are many problems, such as poor project quality and many hidden diseases [1,2,3]. Therefore, dam seepage has become the most common hidden danger of earth rock dams [4,5,6]. At present, there are few studies on whether the construction of concrete cut-off walls in the reinforcement project of earth rock dams will affect the stability and the deformation of the dam.
The deformation of earth dams reinforced by concrete cut-off walls has certain particularity. First, most of the reinforced earth dams are old dams that have been in operation for decades. The consolidation of the dam soil has been basically completed, and the consolidation deformation and self-weight load deformation can be ignored [7,8]. However, the additional cut-off wall will change the seepage field and stress field in the dam, resulting in the reconstruction of the stress deformation of the dam [9]. Secondly, the factors that cause deformation are multi-year cyclic loads, such as reservoir water level load, flooding, and drainage processes [10,11,12]. The operation of the reservoir often experiences the working condition of water level fluctuation [13,14,15]. Water level fluctuation will cause the transient change of soil pore water pressure [16,17]. When the reservoir water level drops too fast, the soil drainage time is insufficient, and the pore water pressure in the dam body cannot dissipate quickly. Thus, the dam slope will form a downward trend under the action of seepage force, which causes slope instability, dam deformation, dam crest cracking, and other failure modes [18,19]. Therefore, it is of great significance for the design and application of seepage walls and the operation and management of reservoir dam projects in practical projects, especially for many small- and medium-sized reservoirs under construction or built, to systematically analyze the influence of seepage wall conditions and water level fluctuation on dam slope stability, dam deformation, and dam crest cracks.
At present, the research on slope stability analysis has been relatively mature [20,21,22,23]. The limit equilibrium method is widely used because of its clear mechanical concept and computational stability [24,25], which divides the sliding soil into several soil strips, and each soil strip and the whole meet the conditions of force and moment balance. That is, according to the shear strength criterion, the stability of the slope is solved by analyzing the balance under the limit state. The limit equilibrium method includes two aspects of calculation: calculating the safety factor of anti-sliding stability on a hypothetical sliding surface and finding a critical sliding surface with the lowest safety factor among the possible sliding surfaces [26]. According to the shear strength criterion, the stability of the slope is solved by analyzing the equilibrium under the limit state [27,28].
In this study, the Wujing project of the earth dam strengthened by the cut-off wall is taken as the research object, in which the stability of the dam slope, deformation of the dam body, and crack width on the dam crest are analyzed by means of limit equilibrium method and in-situ deformation measurement. It has been found that when the reservoir encounters a sudden drawdown, the safety factor will also decrease sharply. The horizontal displacement and settlements of the dam are affected by the change in the upstream reservoir water level. With the rise in the reservoir water level, the longitudinal cracks on the dam crest show a tendency of shrinkage, while the cracks show a tendency of opening when the reservoir water level drops.

2. Project Overview

Wujing reservoir is located in Wujing village, Zhaoxian Town, Wanli District, Nanchang City, Jiangxi Province, China, 3 km away from the urban area of Wanli, which is a small reservoir mainly for water supply and with comprehensive benefits of flood control. On the basis of the original homogeneous earth dam, high-pressure jet grouting was used to build a concrete cut-off wall in the dam in November 2011 to May 2012. Cracks were first found on the dam crest pavement in 2015, and continued to extend from 2015 to 2018. The cracks are about 132 m long and close to the dam axis (concrete cut-off wall). The average width of the cracks is 3 mm, the widest part is 40 mm, and the maximum dislocation is about 4 mm, as shown in Figure 1.
The dam is a homogeneous earth dam. After the construction of the concrete high-pressure jet grouting cut-off wall, the dam crest elevation is 192.55 m, the maximum dam height is 45.4 m, and the dam crest is 181 m long and 8 m wide. The normal pool level is 190 m, the design flood level is 190 m, the check flood level is 190.16 m, and the total storage capacity is 4.48 million m³. From 183 m elevation to dam crest elevation, precast block slope protection is adopted for the upstream slope of the dam, with a slope ratio of 1:2; From the elevation of 170 to 183 m, the upstream slope of the dam adopts dry masonry slope protection, with a slope ratio of 1:2.5. Below the elevation of 170 m, the upstream slope of the dam is a block stone prism with a slope ratio of 1:1.25. From the elevation of 170 m to the elevation of the dam crest, the downstream slope of the dam is protected by concrete grid turf. Below the elevation of 171 m, the downstream slope of the dam is sloped for drainage, as shown in Figure 2.

3. Study on the Influence of Sudden Drawdown on Dam Slope Stability

3.1. Seepage and Slope Stability Analysis Method

The earth rock dam and foundation are assumed to be isotropic porous media, the seepage in the dam body conforms to Darcy’s law, and the seepage control equation is:
x ( k x H x ) + y ( k y H y ) + Q = Θ t
where H is the total head, kx and ky are the horizontal and vertical permeability coefficients, cm/s or m/d, Q is the flow of water on the boundary, cm3/s or m3/d, and Θ is the volumetric moisture content.
Among them, the unsaturated percolation model was adopted from the Fredlund and Xing model, and its expression is:
θ θ s = 1 ln ( 1 + u s / u r ) ln ( 1 + 10 6 / u r ) { ln [ e + ( u s / a ) b u s / u r ] } c
where θ is the volume water content, use is the saturated volume water content, us is the suction, kPa, c is the soil property parameter of the residual water content function, ur is the matrix suction corresponding to the water content, kPa, and a and b are the fitting parameters.
The limit equilibrium method was used to calculate the stability of dam slope. The solution idea is based on the Mohr Coulomb shear strength theory. The slope within the potential sliding surface is divided into several soil strip according to a certain proportion, and the static balance equation is established according to the limit equilibrium conditions between the soil strips. Considering the overall moment balance of sliding soil, the safety factor FS of slope is calculated, and the stability of slope is evaluated according to the equation.
The moment equilibrium relationship is given by:
F S = ( c Δ L R + R N tan ϕ ) W L W N L N
Or expressed by horizontal force balance relation:
F S = ( c Δ L R cos α + R N tan φ cos α ) N sin α
where:
N = W + λ f ( x ) ( c Δ L R cos α F S ) c Δ L sin α F ( cos α + sin α F S ) λ f ( x ) ( cos α tan φ F S sin α )
where c is the cohesion, kPa, ϕ is internal friction angle of soil mass, °. Δ L are the respective soil lengths on the sliding surface, m. L W is the moments of each soil strip against the center of the slip surface, Nm. L N are the moments corresponding to their normal for the midpoint of each soil strip at the sliding surface, Nm. α is the angle between the tangent lines of each soil and the horizontal plane, R is the moment length to the center of the circle, m. N is the normal phase force of the soil strip, kN. W is the weight of soil strip, kN. λ is coefficient of variation of interaction force between soil strips, and the f(x) in Equation (5) is the function of interaction force between soil strips.

3.2. Numerical Model and Parameters

The axis of cut-off wall of Wujing reservoir dam is located on the dam axis with a thickness of 0.25 m and a wall top elevation of 190.5 m. Stone prism is used to fix the foot in the upstream. According to relevant design data, site investigation report and topographic mapping data of dam slope of Wujing Reservoir, a typical section of design is selected to establish a 2D dam model by GeoStudio software to analyze stability of dam slope with sudden drawdown, as shown in Figure 2. The boundary and initial conditions of the upstream face of the dam are the design water level and steady-state seepage field, and the dam foundation is the fully constrained boundary condition.
The Wujing reservoir dam is filled with silty sand and the foundation is granite rock mass, in which the weathered rock mass of the dam foundation mainly concentrates on the downstream side of the dam. According to the engineering geological report, the calculation material parameters of the dam and rock mass foundation are as follows:
When simulating the saturated–unsaturated seepage flow field, the saturated/unsaturated model is used for the dam body, and the saturated model is used for the dam foundation. The concrete cut-off wall is constructed by high-pressure jet grouting, and the measured anti-seepage coefficient of the cut-off wall is 5 × 10−7 cm/s.

3.3. Stability Analysis of Dam Slope under Sudden Drawdown

When the reservoir water level drops in a short time, it is easy to cause dam slope collapse, which is an important reason for the instability of earth rock dams. The process of sudden drawdown is analyzed and simulated under the condition of sudden drawdown of Wujing reservoir with the water level under normal storage conditions of 190 m, and the safety factor of dam slope stability before and after adding the cut-off wall is calculated. The simulation process of sudden drawdown is assumed as: water level drops from 190 m (The normal water level) to 160 m, lasting 10, 6, and 3 days, with descending speeds of 3, 5, and 10 m/day, respectively. The initial condition is the steady-state analysis result under long-term immersion. Figure 3 and Figure 4 have shown the typical most dangerous sliding surface calculated by GeoStudio with the parameter in Table 1 and its safety coefficient before and after sudden drawdown reaches the lowest level respectively with descending speed of 10 m/day by the mean of the limit equilibrium method, and the arrow indicates the effect of upstream reservoir water level.
The safety factor of upstream dam slope decreases with the sudden drawdown. When the water level drops to the lowest level, the safety factor reaches the lowest level, then shows a slow upward trend and finally remains stable. The reason is that the water head difference changes sharply due to the decrease in water level, which makes the stability of the slope decrease. At this time, the suction of the inner matrix of the rocks and soils on the dam slope does not rise in time. With the water level no longer dropping, the suction of the matrix inside the dam slope gradually recovers as the pore water pressure dissipates and the shear strength of the soil body gradually rises, thus the safety factor of stability increases. The stability safety factor duration curve of upstream and downstream dam slopes is shown in Figure 5.
According to the calculation parameters in the Wujing engineering geological report, the stability safety factor of the dam slope is about 2.0 without water level change, which is generally safe and stable. Only at the extreme sudden drawdown can the dam slope be unsafe. The faster the speed of sudden drawdown speed is, the faster the safety factor of upstream dam slope stability will decrease, which will be disadvantageous to the stability of the dam slope. With the end of the sudden drop, the pore water pressure of the dam body soil gradually dissipates, which makes the coefficient of stability safety rise again and finally tends to a stable value.

4. Measuring and Analysis of Dam Deformation under Water Level Rise and Fall

4.1. Arrangement of Measuring Points

Deformation measurements are carried out on the existing observation piers for surface displacement observation of the dam. Surface displacement and settlement of three transverse sections of the dam are observed, and each transverse section has 2 observation points, a total of 6 observation points, as shown in Figure 6.

4.2. Horizontal Displacement

The horizontal displacement of the dam is measured by observing piers. The results of horizontal displacement measurement for three measuring sections are given in Figure 7, Figure 8 and Figure 9, in which data on reservoir water level and rainfall are also given. The horizontal displacement obtained by the monitoring is listed in Table 2.
The horizontal displacement of the dam body at Section 1 # (S11–S21) is only the data on the upstream side, and the downstream measurement data are missing due to the failure of observation pier S21. The maximum displacement amplitude of water level at the upstream measuring point occurred from the end of June to the beginning of August 2020. From the deformation of measuring points and the variation law of the reservoir water level, as the water level rises from March 2020 to August 2020, except for the 8.95 value monitored on June 28, the horizontal displacement of the dam was almost smaller than 0, which generally tended to change to the upstream. As the water level drops from August 2020 to April 2021, the horizontal displacement of the dam was almost all greater than 0, and the horizontal displacement of the dam generally tended to change to the downstream.
From the deformation laws of the three sections, it can be seen that the deformation laws of the measuring points of the 2 # and 3 # sections are similar. As the water level rises from March 2020 to August 2020, if we do not consider the point with huge extreme deformation, it may be caused by measurement error, i.e., 32.05 and 13.70 mm measured on April 7 and 31.72 mm measured on May 6 in S22 and S32, the horizontal displacement of the dam was almost smaller than 0, which generally tended to change to the upstream. As the water level dropped from August 2020 to April 2021, the horizontal displacement of the dam was almost all greater than 0, and the horizontal displacement of the dam generally tends to change to the downstream. On the whole, the horizontal displacement of the dam body was affected by the change of the water level of the upstream reservoir, the water level of the upstream reservoir rises, and the dam body shifted to the upstream direction (the measured value is negative). On the contrary, the water level of the upstream reservoir decreased, and the dam body generally tended to shift to the downstream (the measured value was positive), and the horizontal displacement amplitude of the downstream dam slope measuring points of the two sections was significantly greater than that of the upstream slope measuring points.

4.3. Settlements

The results of settlements measurement for three measuring sections are given in the Figure 10, Figure 11 and Figure 12. The horizontal displacement obtained by monitoring are listed in Table 3.
From the settlement laws of the three sections, it can be seen that as the water level rises from March 2020 to August 2020, except for the settlement monitored on April 7, the horizontal displacement of the dam was almost smaller than 0, which generally tended to change to the upward. As the water level drops from August 2020 to April 2021, the horizontal displacement of the dam was almost all greater than 0, and the horizontal displacement of the dam generally tended to change to the downward. During the continuous change of reservoir water level, the two monitoring points in the same section basically show the same change trend. The change in the dam surface settlement was related to the fluctuation of the upstream reservoir water level. When the upstream reservoir water level rises, the dam surface settlement value was -, indicating that the surface had a trend of rising. On the contrary, when the water level of the upstream reservoir dropped, the surface settlement value of the dam body was +, showing a downward subsidence trend.

5. Crack Propagation Law Based on Deformation Gradient Method

5.1. Deformation Gradient Method

The deformation gradient method was to predict dam cracks based on dam settlement observation data. As shown in Figure 13, if there were two observation points a and b at the same elevation of the dam body, and the horizontal distance between the two points was ∆y, and if the cumulative settlement measured by Ti on a certain calculation date was Za and Zb, respectively, then the deformation gradient of a and b on the date Ti was defined as γ , asshown in Equation (5).
γ tan γ = Δ Z Δ y × 100 = Z a Z b | y a y b | × 100
When the monitoring point of the same cross-section was not at an elevation, the deformation gradient could be modified. As shown in Figure 14, assuming 2 observation points a and b at different elevations of the dam, the horizontal distance between the two points was ∆y, the initial difference in height between the two points was ∆Z1, and the difference in height on a certain calculation date was ∆Z2, then the modified deformation gradient of points a and b was defined as:
Δ γ | tan γ 1 tan γ 2 | × 100
tan γ 1 = Δ Z 1 Δ y
tan γ 2 = Δ Z 2 Δ y
Δ Z 2 = Z a Z b + Δ Z 1
It is worth noting that when the initial elevation difference ∆Z1 = 0, i.e., a and b are at the same elevation, the modified deformational gradient agrees with the calculation result of Equation (5).

5.2. Analysis of Crack Width Propagation Law

Longitudinal cracks of dam crest are distributed along dam axis in plane in the range of dam 0+005~dam 0+148 stake, as shown in Figure 6. The crack width was measured with the vernier caliper. The measured crack width changes with time as shown in Figure 15.
Measuring data from 5 March 2020 to 2 April 2020 show that the overall change of crack width is relatively stable. During the rising process of reservoir water level, the development and change of crack width showed a certain contraction trend, and then the development and change of crack width showed a slowing trend of opening during the falling process of reservoir water level.
According to the monitoring results of Wujing reservoir, the longitudinal crack of the dam crest was analyzed by the deformation gradient method. Table 4 is the result of calculating the deformation gradient according to the monitoring data from March 2020 to March 2021.
Figure 16 shows the variation curve of dam deformation gradient increment and crack width. The monitoring results showed that the variation rule of 3 cracks with deformation gradient is basically the same. Except for the monitoring in June, other monitoring calculation results showed that the change of increment of deformation gradient was basically consistent with that of crack width, i.e., the crack width decreased with the decrease in gradient and increased with the increase in gradient increment.
The relationship between the expansion of dam crest cracks and the uneven settlement of the dam body on both sides of the cracks is shown in Figure 16. The longitudinal cracks on the dam crest of Wujing Reservoir close with the rise of reservoir water and open with the fall of reservoir water, indicating that the soil mass on the upstream slope of the reservoir water fluctuation dam undergoes cyclic expansion and contraction deformation, thus affecting the opening and closing deformation of existing cracks.

6. Discussion and Conclusions

The deformation of the dam is closely related to the change in the reservoir water level, whether for horizontal deformation or settlement deformation. However, due to the different states of different dams, the impact of the dam on the change in the water level is different, as shown in Table 5.
In this study, by means of numerical analysis and in situ measuring, the influence of water level rise and fall on the Wujing earth dam reinforced by the cut-off wall has been analyzed, and the following conclusions can be drawn:
  • Based on the established numerical calculation model of Wujing reservoir, and the geological report parameters, the safety factor of dam slope stability was obtained by the limit equilibrium method, which was about 2.0. When the reservoir encountered a sudden drawdown, the safety factor also decreased sharply. The faster the sudden drawdown was, the faster the safety factor decreased, and the more unfavorable it was to dam slope stability. With the end of the sudden drawdown, the pore water pressure of the dam body soil gradually dissipated, so that the safety factor of stability increased again and finally tended to be stable;
  • The horizontal displacement of the dam was affected by the change in the upstream reservoir water level. It was found that the upstream reservoir water level rose and the horizontal displacement of dam shifted to the upstream direction. The upstream reservoir water level dropped, the horizontal displacement of the dam shifted to downstream, and the change of horizontal displacement of downstream slope was significantly larger than that at measuring point of upstream slope;
  • The settlement deformation of the dam body was related to the fluctuation of the reservoir water level, in which the water level of upstream reservoir rose, and as surface of the dam body rose, conversely, it tended to sink. The fluctuation of the settlement deformation shows that the upstream side was larger than the downstream side, especially during the period of abrupt change in reservoir water level;
  • With the rise in the reservoir water level, the longitudinal cracks on the dam crest showed a tendency of shrinkage, while the cracks showed a tendency of opening when the reservoir water level dropped. The change in the deformation gradient increment was basically consistent with the change in the crack opening, that is, the crack opening decreased with the decrease in the deformation gradient increment and increased with the increase in the gradient increment.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, D.L., J.G., J.Y. and C.C.; Methodology, J.G.; Software, J.Y., C.C., W.Z. and W.S.; Validation, J.G.; Investigation, T.L., B.X. and J.Y.; Resources, C.C.; Data curation, D.L. and T.L.; Writing—original draft, D.L.; Writing—review & editing, D.L. and B.X.; Visualization, B.X., W.Z. and W.S.; Funding acquisition, D.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work is supported by the Jiangxi Provincial Natural Science Foundation (20212BAB214044, 20212BAB214045), and the Jiangxi Provincial Department of water resources Foundation (202224ZDKT08).

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to privacy restrictions.

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to express their thanks to all supporters.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Wang, T.; Chen, J.; Li, P.; Yin, Y.; Shen, C. Natural tracing for concentrated leakage detection in a rockfill dam. Eng. Geol. 2019, 249, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Chen, S.; Gu, C.; Lin, C.; Wang, Y.; Hariri-Ardebili, M.A. Prediction, monitoring, and interpretation of dam leakage flow via adaptative kernel extreme learning machine. Measurement 2020, 166, 108161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Mozafari, M.; Milanović, P.; Jamei, J. Water leakage problems at the Tangab Dam Reservoir (SW Iran), case study of the complexities of dams on karst. Bull. Eng. Geol. Environ. 2021, 80, 7989–8007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Pan, Y.; Liu, Y.; Chen, E.J. Probabilistic investigation on defective jet-grouted cut-off wall with random geometric imperfections. Géotechnique 2019, 69, 420–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Wang, K.; Li, Z.; Zheng, H.; Xu, X.; He, H. A theoretical model for estimating the water-tightness of jet-grouted cut-off walls with geometric imperfections. Comput. Geotech. 2021, 138, 104316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Shepherd, D.A.; Kotan, E.; Dehn, F. Plastic concrete for cut-off walls: A review. Constr. Build. Mater. 2020, 255, 119248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Luo, J.; Zhang, Q.; Li, L.; Xiang, W. Monitoring and characterizing the deformation of an earth dam in Guangxi Province, China. Eng. Geol. 2019, 248, 50–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Yavaşoğlu, H.H.; Kalkan, Y.; Tiryakioğlu, I.; Yigit, C.; Özbey, V.; Alkan, M.N.; Bilgi, S.; Alkan, R.M. Monitoring the deformation and strain analysis on the Ataturk Dam, Turkey. Geomat. Nat. Hazards Risk 2018, 9, 94–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Bestuzheva, A.S.; Anakhaev, K.K. Seepage Through a Homogeneous Earth-Fill Dam with a Cut-Off Wall on a Permeable Foundation. Power Technol. Eng. 2020, 54, 147–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Barzaghi, R.; Cazzaniga, N.E.; De Gaetani, C.I.; Pinto, L.; Tornatore, V. Estimating and Comparing Dam Deformation Using Classical and GNSS Techniques. Sensors 2018, 18, 756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Lai, J.; Liu, H.; Qiu, J.; Chen, J. Settlement Analysis of Saturated Tailings Dam Treated by CFG Pile Composite Foundation. Adv. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2016, 2016, 7383762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Cheng, X.; Li, Q.; Zhou, Z.; Luo, Z.; Liu, M.; Liu, L. Research on a Seepage Monitoring Model of a High Core Rockfill Dam Based on Machine Learning. Sensors 2018, 18, 2749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Ri, Y.N.; Han, U.C.; Jang, U.J.; Jong, D.Y.; Kim, C.U. Study on Stability Reduction Characteristics of Earth and Rockfill Dams under Rapid Drawdown Using Fully Coupled Seepage-Stress Analysis. Adv. Civ. Eng. 2022, 2022, 7954991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Azadi, A.; Irani, A.E.; Azarafza, M.; Bonab, M.H.; Sarand, F.B.; Derakhshani, R. Coupled Numerical and Analytical Stability Analysis Charts for an Earth-Fill Dam under Rapid Drawdown Conditions. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 4550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Sun, G.; Lin, S.; Jiang, W.; Yang, Y. A Simplified Solution for Calculating the Phreatic Line and Slope Stability during a Sudden Drawdown of the Reservoir Water Level. Geofluids 2018, 2018, 1859285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Zhang, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Xue, S.; Wang, R. Stability analysis of a typical landslide mass in the Three Gorges Reservoir under varying reservoir water levels. Environ. Earth Sci. 2020, 79, 42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Meng, Q.; Qian, K.; Zhong, L.; Gu, J.; Li, Y.; Fan, K.; Yan, L. Numerical Analysis of Slope Stability under Reservoir Water Level Fluctuations Using a FEM-LEM-Combined Method. Geofluids 2020, 2020, 6683311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zhang, H.; Jing, Y.; Chen, J.; Gao, Z.; Xu, Y. Characteristics and causes of crest cracking on a high core-wall rockfill dam: A case study. Eng. Geol. 2022, 297, 106488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Wang, Y.; Li, J.; Wu, Z.; Chen, J.; Yin, C.; Bian, K. Dynamic Risk Evaluation and Early Warning of Crest Cracking for High Earth-Rockfill Dams through Bayesian Parameter Updating. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 7627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Kaur, A.; Sharma, R. Slope stability analysis techniques: A review. Int. J. Eng. Appl. Sci. Technol. 2016, 1, 52–57. [Google Scholar]
  21. Firincioglu, B.S.; Ercanoglu, M. Insights and perspectives into the limit equilibrium method from 2D and 3D analyses. Eng. Geol. 2021, 281, 105968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Arvin, M.R.; Zakeri, A.; Shoorijeh, M.B. Using Finite Element Strength Reduction Method for Stability Analysis of Geocell-Reinforced Slopes. Geotech. Geol. Eng. 2019, 37, 1453–1467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Zhang, K.; Cao, P.; Meng, J.; Li, K.; Fan, W. Modeling the Progressive Failure of Jointed Rock Slope Using Fracture Mechanics and the Strength Reduction Method. Rock Mech. Rock Eng. 2015, 48, 771–785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Dong-Ping, D.; Liang, L.; Jian-Feng, W.; Lian-Heng, Z. Limit equilibrium method for rock slope stability analysis by using the Generalized Hoek–Brown criterion. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 2016, 89, 176–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Liu, S.; Su, Z.; Li, M.; Shao, L. Slope stability analysis using elastic finite element stress fields. Eng. Geol. 2020, 273, 105673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Siacara, A.; Beck, A.; Futai, M. Reliability analysis of rapid drawdown of an earth dam using direct coupling. Comput. Geotech. 2020, 118, 103336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Duncan, J.; Wright, S. The accuracy of equilibrium methods of slope stability analysis. Eng. Geol. 1980, 16, 5–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Kong, X.; Cai, G.; Cheng, Y.; Zhao, C. Numerical Implementation of Three-Dimensional Nonlinear Strength Model of Soil and Its Application in Slope Stability Analysis. Sustainability 2022, 14, 5127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Bayrak, T. Modelling the relationship between water level and vertical displacements on the Yamula Dam, Turkey. Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. 2007, 7, 289–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Liu, Y.; Zheng, D.; Georgakis, C.; Kabel, T.; Cao, E.; Wu, X.; Ma, J. Deformation Analysis of an Ultra-High Arch Dam under Different Water Level Conditions Based on Optimized Dynamic Panel Clustering. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Wu, F.; Qi, S.; Lan, H. Mechanism of uplift deformation of the dam foundation of Jiangya Water Power Station, Hunan Province, P.R. China. Hydrogeol. J. 2005, 13, 451–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Khalilzad, M.; Gabr, M.A.; Hynes, M.E. Deformation-Based Limit State Analysis of Embankment Dams Including Geometry and Water Level Effects. Int. J. Géoméch. 2015, 15, 04014086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Jadid, R.; Montoya, B.; Bennett, V.; Gabr, M. Effect of repeated rise and fall of water level on seepage-induced deformation and related stability analysis of Princeville levee. Eng. Geol. 2020, 266, 105458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Dam crest of Wujing reservoir.
Figure 1. Dam crest of Wujing reservoir.
Water 15 00140 g001
Figure 2. Numerical model of Wujing reservoir dam.
Figure 2. Numerical model of Wujing reservoir dam.
Water 15 00140 g002
Figure 3. The most dangerous sliding surface of upstream dam slope before sudden drop of water level.
Figure 3. The most dangerous sliding surface of upstream dam slope before sudden drop of water level.
Water 15 00140 g003
Figure 4. The most dangerous sliding surface of upstream dam slope reaches a stable state after sudden drop of water level.
Figure 4. The most dangerous sliding surface of upstream dam slope reaches a stable state after sudden drop of water level.
Water 15 00140 g004
Figure 5. Duration curve of dam slope stability safety factor under different sudden drawdown speeds.
Figure 5. Duration curve of dam slope stability safety factor under different sudden drawdown speeds.
Water 15 00140 g005
Figure 6. Layout diagram of deformation measurement points of Wujing dam.
Figure 6. Layout diagram of deformation measurement points of Wujing dam.
Water 15 00140 g006
Figure 7. 1 # section horizontal displacement duration curve (upstream is −, downstream is +).
Figure 7. 1 # section horizontal displacement duration curve (upstream is −, downstream is +).
Water 15 00140 g007
Figure 8. 2 # section horizontal displacement duration curve (upstream is −, downstream is +).
Figure 8. 2 # section horizontal displacement duration curve (upstream is −, downstream is +).
Water 15 00140 g008
Figure 9. 3 # section horizontal displacement duration curve (upstream is −, downstream is +).
Figure 9. 3 # section horizontal displacement duration curve (upstream is −, downstream is +).
Water 15 00140 g009
Figure 10. 1 # section settlement displacement duration curve (downward is +, upward is −).
Figure 10. 1 # section settlement displacement duration curve (downward is +, upward is −).
Water 15 00140 g010
Figure 11. 2 # section settlement displacement duration curve (downward is +, upward is −).
Figure 11. 2 # section settlement displacement duration curve (downward is +, upward is −).
Water 15 00140 g011
Figure 12. 3 # section settlement displacement duration curve (downward is +, upward is −).
Figure 12. 3 # section settlement displacement duration curve (downward is +, upward is −).
Water 15 00140 g012
Figure 13. Schematic diagram of deformation gradient method.
Figure 13. Schematic diagram of deformation gradient method.
Water 15 00140 g013
Figure 14. Schematic diagram of modified deformation gradient method.
Figure 14. Schematic diagram of modified deformation gradient method.
Water 15 00140 g014
Figure 15. Time history curve of crack width and reservoir water level.
Figure 15. Time history curve of crack width and reservoir water level.
Water 15 00140 g015
Figure 16. Time history curve of crack width and deformation gradient.
Figure 16. Time history curve of crack width and deformation gradient.
Water 15 00140 g016aWater 15 00140 g016b
Table 1. Model calculation parameter.
Table 1. Model calculation parameter.
MaterialPermeability Coefficient/cm/sDensity/kg/m3Cohesion/kPaFriction Angle
Silty sand of dam body5.0 × 10−517002020
Dam foundation overburden5.0 × 10−418001528
Strongly weathered rock mass of dam foundation1.0 × 10−424001530
Weakly weathered rock mass of dam foundation1.0 × 10−526002033
Basement rock1.0 × 10−627003035
Table 2. Horizontal displacement.
Table 2. Horizontal displacement.
Monitoring Time1# Section2# Section3# Section
S11S12S21S22S31S32
5 March 20200.00/0.000.000.000.00
23 March 2020−2.753.071.17−0.99−0.67
7 April 2020−2.660.3832.05−0.9713.70
6 May 20200.841.31−31.720.69−12.90
21 May 20200.530.62−1.332.580.55
15 June 2020−5.46−2.933.22−1.311.03
28 June 20208.95−3.04−2.01−1.23−0.96
3 August 2020−17.46−9.96−4.01−11.80−6.05
17 August 20203.13−0.020.320.990.06
4 September 20200.41−5.000.71−2.371.26
12 October 2020−3.885.52−0.210.10−0.28
4 December 202011.934.901.834.901.91
28 December 20201.57−0.464.811.360.07
18 March 20214.047.98−1.016.040.76
26 March 2021−2.17−2.500.981.942.25
2 April 2021−1.540.54−1.95−3.96−1.54
Table 3. Settlement.
Table 3. Settlement.
Monitoring Time1# Section2# Section3# Section
S11S12S21S22S31S32
5 March 20200.000.000.000.000.000.00
23 March 2020−34.50−38.30−34.20−25.19−32.40−28.60
7 April 202015.504.407.704.794.107.90
21 May 2020−9.30−1.70−3.50−2.901.70−6.60
15 June 2020−4.80−9.80−9.00−16.00−8.20−5.30
28 June 2020−5.906.80−0.109.501.101.60
3 August 2020−6.20−11.20−4.40−4.10−4.70−1.90
17 August 20206.805.40−1.500.802.601.80
4 September 2020−2.308.704.306.70−4.200.50
12 October 20203.10−9.90−2.50−8.903.20−3.00
4 December 20206.906.302.604.704.601.70
28 December 20204.00−0.105.903.502.602.30
18 March 2021−3.703.50−3.10−0.70−4.30−1.00
26 March 2021−5.20−1.60−1.90−2.501.70−0.30
2 April 20218.60−1.006.00−3.102.201.90
Table 4. Gradient calculation results.
Table 4. Gradient calculation results.
Monitoring TimeSettlement Z/mmHorizontal Distance of Observation Points on the Same Section/mDeformation Gradient/%
1# Section2# Section3# Sectionγ1γ2γ3
S31S32S21S22S11S12
5 March 20200.00.00.00.00.00.09.00000
23 March 2020−32.4−28.6−34.2−25.19−34.5−38.30.04220.10010.0422
7 April 20204.17.97.74.7915.54.40.04220.03230.1233
21 May 20201.7−6.6−3.5−2.9−9.3−1.70.09220.00670.0844
15 June 2020−8.2−5.3−9−16−4.8−9.80.03220.07780.0556
28 June 20201.11.6−0.19.5−5.96.80.00560.10670.1411
3 August 2020−4.7−1.9−4.4−4.1−6.2−11.20.03110.00330.0556
17 August 20202.61.8−1.50.86.85.40.00890.02560.0156
4 September 2020−4.20.54.36.7−2.38.70.05220.02670.1222
12 October 20203.2−3−2.5−8.93.1−9.90.06890.07110.1444
4 December 20204.61.72.64.76.96.30.03220.02330.0067
28 December 20202.62.35.93.54.0−0.10.00330.02670.0456
18 March 2021−4.3−1.0−3.1−0.7−3.73.5 0.03670.02670.0800
Notes: The initial elevation difference is 4.3198 m for 1# section, 4.4942 m for 2# section, and 4.1936 m for 3# section.
Table 5. Study on the effect of water level fluctuation on dam deformation.
Table 5. Study on the effect of water level fluctuation on dam deformation.
DamDam TypeResearch MethodWhether the Water Level Fluctuation Affects the Dam DeformationHow Water Level Fluctuation Affects Dam Deformation
Chengbihe [7]Earth damIn situ measurementsYesSettlement on the dam’s upstream side
Yamula [29]Earth damIn situ measurementsYesVertical deformation. The rising water level increases the subsidence velocity
An ultra-high arch dam [30]Concrete arch damIn situ measurementsYes, but the influence of water level on dam deformation is hysteretic.With the rise of the water level, the cluster center area also rises, indicating that the trend of the expansion and upward movement of the maximum deformation area of the dam body
Jiangya [31]Gravity damIn situ measurementsYesThe reservoir impoundment is the predominant
cause of the uplift of dam foundation.
An earth embankments of dams [32]Earth dam.Numerical simulationYesThe horizontal deformation of the dam toe is higher for a higher rising rate
Princeville [33]Earth leveeNumerical simulationYesThe Factor of safety is affected by rate of rise/drawdown of the water level
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Liu, D.; Lin, T.; Gao, J.; Xue, B.; Yang, J.; Chen, C.; Zhang, W.; Sun, W. Study on the Influence of Water Level on Earth Dam Reinforced by Cut-Off Wall: A Case Study in Wujing Reservoir. Water 2023, 15, 140. https://doi.org/10.3390/w15010140

AMA Style

Liu D, Lin T, Gao J, Xue B, Yang J, Chen C, Zhang W, Sun W. Study on the Influence of Water Level on Earth Dam Reinforced by Cut-Off Wall: A Case Study in Wujing Reservoir. Water. 2023; 15(1):140. https://doi.org/10.3390/w15010140

Chicago/Turabian Style

Liu, Da, Taiqing Lin, Jianglin Gao, Binghan Xue, Jianhua Yang, Congxin Chen, Weipeng Zhang, and Wenbin Sun. 2023. "Study on the Influence of Water Level on Earth Dam Reinforced by Cut-Off Wall: A Case Study in Wujing Reservoir" Water 15, no. 1: 140. https://doi.org/10.3390/w15010140

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop