Next Article in Journal
Evolutionary Characteristics of Runoff in a Changing Environment: A Case Study of Dawen River, China
Next Article in Special Issue
Experimental and Numerical Study on Flow Control Using 3-Array Submerged Vane in Laboratory Channel Bend
Previous Article in Journal
Comparison of Machine Learning Algorithms for Merging Gridded Satellite and Earth-Observed Precipitation Data
Previous Article in Special Issue
Simultaneous Removal of Metal Ions from Wastewater by a Greener Approach
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Floating Photovoltaic Plants as an Effective Option to Reduce Water Evaporation in Water-Stressed Regions and Produce Electricity: A Case Study of Lake Nasser, Egypt

1
Mechanical Power Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Tanta University, Tanta 31521, Egypt
2
Faculty of Engineering, Delta University for Science and Technology, Gamasa 35712, Egypt
3
Institute of Circular and Sustainable Construction, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Technical University of Košice, 040 01 Košice, Slovakia
4
Department of Water and Water Structures Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Zagazig University, Zagazig 44519, Egypt
5
Department of Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Technical University of Košice, 040 01 Košice, Slovakia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Water 2023, 15(4), 635; https://doi.org/10.3390/w15040635
Submission received: 23 December 2022 / Revised: 24 January 2023 / Accepted: 31 January 2023 / Published: 6 February 2023

Abstract

:
Water resources are considered one of the most critical and indispensable elements to ensure the survival of all living organisms on the planet. Since there is a close relationship between water, energy, and food security, this interdependence presents a major global societal challenge. While Egypt is one of the countries that suffers the most from water poverty, it has Lake Nasser which is considered one of the largest artificial lakes in the world, with an estimated area of about 5250 km2. Hence, this work aims to conserve such water resources while addressing two critical issues related to water and energy. To achieve this goal, this study proposed the use of partial coverage technology on Lake Nasser with floating photovoltaic (FPV) panels. The results of the study showed that the partial coverage of Lake Nasser with FPV panels represents a very effective proposal to preserve the water resources of Egypt, which suffers from water poverty. The savings in water evaporation in Lake Nasser reached 61.71% (9,074,081,000 m3/year) and the annual rate of electricity production was 467.99 TWh/year when 50% of the area of Lake Nasser was covered with FPV panels.

1. Introduction

In the twenty-first century, water scarcity has become one of the main problems facing all countries in the world, as nearly two-thirds of the world’s population suffers from water stress for at least a month each year, in addition to about half a billion people who suffer daily from severe water shortages [1,2]. Water is not only used for humans, but is also used in agriculture and food production. In many regions around the world, the extraction of water resources and their delivery to consumers or agricultural land depends largely on energy. Hence, there is a close interdependence between water resources, food, and energy, for which reason the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) was established [3,4]. Ensuring the continuity of food supplies for the global population requires the preservation of water resources as well as the availability of energy, and this represents a significant challenge for the global community [5,6]. A recent study indicated that agricultural land irrigation is the world’s largest consumer of fresh water, as it consumes about 70% of water resources. This percentage rises to 90% in developing countries compared to 60% in developed countries [7]. Hence, for developing countries that suffer from water poverty, any approach that can conserve water resources, especially in areas with hot and dry weather, will be a fundamental solution not only from the point of view of food security, but also an effective case in terms of economic development. Globally, basins are used for drinking and irrigating crops. As there are approximately 277,400,000 small-scale irrigation basins (<10,000 square meters) and 24,120,000 large-scale irrigation basins (10,000–100,000 square meters), these basins represent more than 90% of the standing water used in irrigation of crops globally [8,9].
The surface evaporation of water in ponds, lakes, and reservoirs is an important factor in water loss due to its exposure to direct sunlight. Therefore, surface evaporation of water represents one of the factors of the water scarcity problem in many countries of the world, especially remote areas. Creating a shadow on the surface of the water is one of the ways to reduce the rates of surface evaporation of water in ponds, lakes, and reservoirs [10]. This shade can be achieved by placing floating photovoltaic cells on the surface of the water [11]. The floating photovoltaic cells on the surface of the water are characterized by reducing surface evaporation rates and improving the efficiency of photovoltaic cells [12]. The installation of photovoltaic panels on water bodies is an effective alternative to traditional methods where photovoltaic panels are installed on the ground [13]. Japan was the first country to build floating photovoltaic systems on water bodies and to compare its performance with that of conventional photovoltaic systems for research purposes [14]. Floating photovoltaic panels are installed on natural water bodies such as lakes, reservoirs, dams, and ponds [15]. The technology of floating photovoltaic panels on natural water bodies has attracted worldwide attention since 2007, when a limited number of medium and large-capacity floating photovoltaic power stations were established in many American and Asian countries [16]. The floating photovoltaic panels effectively shade the water surface and thus, help reduce surface evaporation rates and reduce water loss [17]. Photovoltaic panels can be installed on the surface of the water in different ways. It should be noted that the main motive behind the use of floating photovoltaic (PV) systems is to avoid the purchase or lease of land and, most importantly, to improve the efficiency of PV panels.
Floating photovoltaic panels on water bodies are characterized by a higher level of electrical efficiency due to their cooling by water vapor [18,19]. Since floating photovoltaic panels are characterized by their ability to reduce surface evaporation rates from water bodies as well as generate electricity, floating photovoltaic systems can contribute to the stability of the agricultural and electricity generating sectors [20,21]. Many researchers have studied the effect of photovoltaic systems on the relationship between water, food, and energy [22,23,24]. Padilha et al. [25] studied the possibility of using photovoltaic plants in arid regions of Brazil to increase water security and power generation. They mentioned that the surface evaporation of water in dam reservoirs represents one of the main obstacles to achieving water stability in the arid regions of Brazil, and they found that the use of floating photovoltaic systems reduced the rates of surface evaporation and electricity generation in these areas [26]. They also conducted an economic feasibility study for the use of such projects [27,28].
By reviewing the previous studies, it was found that the use of floating photovoltaic panels to reduce water evaporation rates in water bodies, whether lakes, ponds, or water reservoirs, has a positive effect in terms of reducing water losses and electricity production. Hence, the use of floating photovoltaic panels conserves water resources while addressing the two important issues of water and energy, thus achieving the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals. Egypt is one of the first countries to suffer from water poverty and thus, contains Lake Nasser, one of the largest artificial lakes in the world with an estimated area of about 5250 km2. This work aims to conserve such water resources while addressing the two important issues of water and energy, thus striving for achievement of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals. To achieve this, the study proposed the use of partial coverage technology for Lake Nasser with floating photovoltaic panels to reduce the rates of surface evaporation of water and generate electricity, while at the same time preserving fish wealth. This study dealt with four proposals to cover Lake Nasser with floating photovoltaic (FPV) panels at different coverage rates: 50%, 40%, 30%, and 20%.

2. Data and Methods

The freshwater limitation represents one of the most important and most dangerous problems facing the Arab Republic of Egypt, and since Egypt lies below the water poverty line, this research aimed to reduce water evaporation rates from water bodies. This research examined the effect of floating photovoltaic panels on surface water evaporation rates in Lake Nasser, Aswan, Egypt. Given the results of this study, they fall into the category of applied research.
First, the location of Lake Nasser was determined and data about the lake collected. Second, the surface water evaporation rates were calculated for open water surface with and without FPV panels. Third, the volume of evaporation water savings was calculated. Lastly, the amount of electrical power that could be produced from the FPV panels was determined. All the above data was calculated using climate and radiation data for the location of Lake Nasser.

2.1. Reservoir Area Determination of Lake Nasser

Lake Nasser, or the High Dam Lake, is one of the largest artificial lakes in the world, located in southern Egypt, south of Aswan (22°25′ N 31°45′ E), and in northern Sudan. The name Lake Nasser is given to the largest part that lies within the borders of Egypt and represents 83% of the total area of the lake, while the remaining part located within the borders of Sudan is called Lake Nuba. It was formed as a result of the water accumulated behind the High Dam after its construction (which lasted from 1958 to 1970), with a length of 500 km, an area of about 5250 km², and a depth of 180 m with a total storage capacity of 162 billion cubic meters, making it the largest artificial lake in the world and the second largest lake by area (Figure 1 and Figure 2).

2.2. Estimation Method of Surface Water Evaporation Rates

This section presents the method used to estimate surface water evaporation rates with and without floating photovoltaic panels.

2.2.1. Evaporation Estimation for Open Water Surface without Floating Photovoltaic Panels

Water evaporation from the open water surface of Lake Nasser without a floating photovoltaic structure was estimated by using the Penman-Monteith equation [6,29]:
E = 0.408     Q G + γ   900 T a + 273   u 2   e s e a + γ   1 + 0.34   u 2
where E′ is the average evaporation per day (mm/day); G is the heat flux in soil, which is zero for water; Q is the daily average irradiation balance (MJ/m2/day); ∆ is the slope of saturation vapor pressure curve; γ is the psychrometric constant (kPa/°C); u2 is the wind speed on a height of 2 m (m/s); Ta is the average ambient air temperature (°C); es is the saturated vapor pressure (kPa); ea is the actual vapor pressure (kPa). The values of γ, ∆, es, and ea are calculated as follows [29,30,31]:
γ = 0.665 × 10 3 × P a t m
= 4098   e s T a + 273 2
e s = 0.6108   e 17.27   T a T a + 273
e a = e s   R H 100

2.2.2. Evaporation Estimation for Incorporating Floating Photovoltaic Panels

Water evaporation from Lake Nasser covered by the floating photovoltaic structure depended on the PV panel configurations.
The total irradiation from Lake Nasser covered by the floating photovoltaic panels (Qtot) consisted of the surface area covered by floating photovoltaic panels and the irradiation underneath the area covered by the floating photovoltaic panels (Qunder), calculated as [29,30,31]:
Q t o t = Q   1 x + x   Q u n d e r
The irradiation underneath the area covered by floating photovoltaic panels (Qunder) depended on the long-wave and shortwave radiation, calculated as:
Q u n d e r = 0.1   σ   T w 4   0.56 0.0092   e a
Finally, the water evaporation from Lake Nasser covered by the FPV structure (EFPV) was calculated as follows [29,30,31]:
E F P V = 1 x   E t o t
E t o t = 0.408     Q t o t G + γ   900 T a + 273   u 2   e s e a + γ   1 + 0.34   u 2
where x is the ratio between the water surface covered by the FPV structure to the total Lake Nasser flooded area; Tw is the water temperature (K); and σ is the Stefan-Boltzmann constant (4.903 × 10−9 MJ/m2 K4 day).

2.2.3. Volume of Evaporation Water Savings

The volume of evaporation water savings, EWS (m3/year), was calculated as follows [29]:
E W S = E E F P V   A r e s × 10 3 × 365
where Ares is total Lake Nasser flooded area (km2).

2.3. Design of the Floating Photovoltaic (FPV) System

The objectives for covering Lake Nasser with an FPV system were to reduce evaporation from the water surface by placing the units on a floating platform with polyethylene, and to increase the efficiency of electricity generation by directing them towards the south at an angle of inclination equal to the latitude angle of the city of Aswan (Figure 3).
The floating platform consisted of several photovoltaic panels of the type (AE HM400M6-72) 400 W monocrystalline modules. The number of FPV panels utilized in this study depended on the area proposed to be covered. These FPV panels were connected in series and placed in multiple rows, with each series connected to the MPPT input of the inverter. These inverters were connected to a transformer fixed on the ground and connected to a high-voltage transmission network. The platform area of each FPV panel utilized in this study was 1.979 m × 1.002 m and 1.983 m2.
Solar radiation and cell temperature are the two most important factors affecting the output power of a photovoltaic unit. Therefore, it was necessary to calculate the cell temperature first in order to calculate the output power of the PV modules. To calculate the output power of the PV modules, it was necessary to know the optical and thermal properties of all materials used in the manufacture of PV modules, and this data was obtained from the PV module manufacturer. The cell temperature (Tm) and module output power (Pm) were calculated as follows [29,32]:
T m = T a + G T G T , N O C T 9.5 5.7 + 3.8   u T N O C T T a ,   N O C T 1 η m τ α
P m = P P e a k G T G S t 1 α T T m T S t
where Ta is the temperature of ambient air (°C); GT is the intensity of total irradiance on module surface (W/m2); GT,NOCT = 800 W/m2; u is the wind speed (m/s); TNOCT is the nominal operating cell temperature TNOCT = 45 °C; Ta,NOCT = 20 °C; ηm is the module efficiency and is given by 21.2%; τα is the coefficient of transmittance absorptance which can be estimated as 0.9; PPeak is the peak power of module (400 W given by manufacturer); GSt = 1000 W/m2; αT = −0.38% °C; and TSt = 25 °C.
After calculating the output power for each module, it was multiplied by the total number of the modules, which depended on the percentage of water surface coverage with FPV panels, to calculate the power produced from all modules. The overall system efficiency (ηsys) was calculated by giving the cable efficiency (ηcable = 99.4%), inverter efficiency (ηinv = 97.5%), and transformer efficiency (ηT = 97%). The AC power at the output of the transformer and at entering the transmission line was calculated as:
η s y s = η c a b l e   η i n v   η T
The output AC power supplied to transmission line was calculated as:
P o u t p u t ,   A C = P m     η s y s

3. Results

To explore the best way to use the FPV panels technique, four different cases were studied:
  • Case study 1: 50% of the total submerged area was covered by FPV panels.
  • Case study 2: 40% of the total submerged area was covered by FPV panels.
  • Case study 3: 30% of the total submerged area was covered by FPV panels.
  • Case study 4: 20% of the total submerged area was covered by FPV panels.
Figure 4 shows the data of average daily solar irradiation and average daily ambient temperature that were imported from the Egyptian Surface Meteorology and Solar Energy Database of the city of Aswan, Egypt (22°25′ N 31°45′ E).

3.1. Evaporation Savings

This section presents the effect of partial coverage of Lake Nasser with FPV panels on water surface evaporation rates. This study dealt with four proposals for partial coverage of Lake Nasser with FPV panels to show the effect of these four proposals on the results of evaporation water savings.
The collected parameter values, as well as the estimated values of the variables that do not depend on the FPV panels proposed in this study, are summarized in Table 1. In addition, the values of the collected parameters and the calculated values of the variables for the four cases proposed with different coverage rates of 50% (Case study 1), 40% (Case study 2), 30% (Case study 3), and 20% (Case study 4), are summarized in Table 2 and Table 3.
Figure 5 presents the average daily evaporation in each month for Lake Nasser, Aswan, Egypt (22°25′ N 31°45′ E) for the cases with and without FPV panels. As is evident in Figure 5, as well as in Table 1, if Lake Nasser was not covered by floating photovoltaic panels, the average daily evaporation during the months of the year ranged between 3.933 and 10.447 mm/day. This large discrepancy in the average daily evaporation during the months of the year is mainly due to the effect of climatic changes throughout the year. As shown in Figure 5 as well as Table 2 and Table 3, when 50% of the Lake Nasser surface area was covered with floating photovoltaic panels, the average daily evaporation from Lake Nasser was reduced and ranged between 1.591 and 3.785 mm/day. Furthermore, when 40% of the Lake Nasser surface area was covered with floating photovoltaic panels, the average daily evaporation from Lake Nasser was reduced and ranged between 1.999 and 4.887 mm/day. When 30% of the Lake Nasser surface area was covered with floating photovoltaic panels, the average daily evaporation from Lake Nasser was reduced and ranged between 2.437 and 6.105 mm/day. Finally, when 20% of the Lake Nasser surface area was covered with floating photovoltaic panels, the average daily evaporation from Lake Nasser was reduced and ranged between 2.906 and 7.437 mm/day.
Figure 6 and Figure 7 show the savings in surface evaporation (mm/day) and volume of evaporation water savings (m3/day) that resulted from the installation of floating PV panels in Lake Nasser during the months of the year. The rates of savings in surface evaporation depended on the percentage of the area covered by the FPV panels. It is clear from the results presented in Figure 6 and Figure 7 that for the case of covering 50% of the area of Lake Nasser with floating photovoltaic panels (Case Study 1), the savings in surface evaporation ranged between 2.343 and 6.662 mm/day (12,299,915–34,974,125 m3/day) throughout the year; for the case of covering 40% of the area of Lake Nasser (Case Study 2), the savings in surface evaporation ranged between 1.934 and 5.56 mm/day (10,155,915–29,187,464 m3/day) throughout the year; for the case of covering 30% of the area of Lake Nasser (Case Study 3), the savings in surface evaporation ranged between 1.496 and 4.342 mm/day (7,853,921–22,796,718 m3/day) throughout the year; and for the case of covering 20% of the area of Lake Nasser (Case Study 4), the savings in surface evaporation ranged between 1.027 and 2.958 mm/day (5,393,939–15,801,891 m3/day) throughout the year. These discrepancies in the savings values in surface evaporation for each of the four cases proposed were due to changes in weather conditions throughout the year.
The results presented in Figure 5, Figure 6 and Figure 7 and Table 1, Table 2 and Table 3 concluded that the installation of FPV panels in Lake Nasser represents a very effective proposal, especially for Egypt which suffers from water poverty for agriculture, domestic use and drinking. In addition, the construction of the Renaissance Dam currently being built in Ethiopia has caused tensions between Egypt, Sudan, and Ethiopia. The rate of water evaporation savings in Lake Nasser reached 61.71% (9,074,081,000 m3/year) when covering 50% of the area of Lake Nasser with floating photovoltaic panels (Case Study 1). When covering 40% of the area of Lake Nasser (Case Study 2), the savings in water evaporation in Lake Nasser reached 51.24% (7,544,251,000 m3/year). The rate of water evaporation savings in Lake Nasser reached 39.83% (5,871,927,000 m3/year) when covering 30% of the area of Lake Nasser (Case Study 3), and the rate of water evaporation savings in Lake Nasser reached 27.49% (4,057,111,000 m3/year) when covering 20% of the Lake Nasser area with floating photovoltaic panels (Case Study 4).

3.2. Installed Capacity and Electricity Output of FPV Array

Figure 8 and Table 4 show the daily and annual electricity rates expected to be generated from the FPV panels system on the surface of Lake Nasser for the four cases proposed in this study, according to the climatic conditions of Aswan, Egypt. As shown in Figure 8, the daily rates of electricity expected to be generated from the FPV panels system for the four cases proposed in this study changed throughout the year as a result of changing climatic conditions. The daily rates of electricity production ranged between 877.9 and 1666.5 GWh/day when covering 50% of Lake Nasser with floating photovoltaic panels (Case Study 1). With 40% of Lake Nasser covered by floating photovoltaic panels (Case Study 2), the daily rates of electricity production range between 702.3 and 1333.2 GWh/day. The daily rates of electricity production ranged between 526.8 and 999.9 GWh/day when covering 30% of Lake Nasser with floating photovoltaic panels (Case Study 3). Lastly, with 20% of Lake Nasser covered with floating photovoltaic panels (Case Study 4), the daily rates of electricity production ranged between 351.2 and 666.6 GWh/day.
The results presented previously showed that covering Lake Nasser with floating photovoltaic panels represents a very effective solution for Egypt, which suffers from water poverty in addition to electric power. As shown in Table 4, the annual rates of electricity production from the floating photovoltaic system of Lake Nasser depended on the percentage of the area covered by the floating photovoltaic panels. The annual rate of electricity production from the FPV panels system for Lake Nasser reached 467.99 TWh/year, 374.41 TWh/year, 280.787 TWh/year, and 187.21 TWh/year when covering 50% (Case Study 1), 40% (Case Study 2), 30% (Case Study 3), and 20% (Case Study 4) of Lake Nasser with FPV panels, respectively.

4. Conclusions

Floating solar photovoltaic panels are an advanced technology that aims to reduce the rates of water evaporation from water bodies to reduce the problem of water shortages that most countries of the world suffer from, in addition to generating electricity while at the same time eliminating the need to use valuable land. At the global level, we find that irrigation ponds contain nearly 70% of freshwater resources, and this percentage rises to 90% for remote areas. Lake Nasser (the lake of the High Dam) is considered one of the largest artificial lakes in the world, and it is located in southern Egypt, south of Aswan (22°25′ N 31°45′ E), with an estimated area of about 5250 square kilometers. Egypt is among the countries that suffer from water poverty and this problem will be exacerbated in the future due to Ethiopia’s construction of the Renaissance Dam, which has led to strained relations between Egypt, Sudan, and Ethiopia. Therefore, the current study proposed the use of floating photovoltaic technology to partially cover Lake Nasser to reduce water evaporation rates and produce electricity. Covering Lake Nasser with floating photovoltaic cells can reduce water evaporation rates, helping to solve the problem of water poverty that Egypt suffers from. This paper dealt with four proposals to partially cover Lake Nasser with floating photovoltaic panels. In the first proposal, 50% of the area of Lake Nasser was covered by floating photovoltaic panels. In the second proposal, 40% of the area of Lake Nasser was covered by floating photovoltaic panels. In the third proposal, 30% of the area of Lake Nasser was covered by floating photovoltaic panels. In the fourth proposal, 20% of the area of Lake Nasser was covered with floating photovoltaic panels. Among the most important results reached are the following:
  • The installation of FPV panels on Lake Nasser is a very effective solution for Egypt which suffers from water poverty, as the rate of water evaporation savings in Lake Nasser reached 61.71% (9,074 081, 000 m3/year) when covering 50% of Lake Nasser area with floating photovoltaic panels.
  • The rate of water evaporation savings in Lake Nasser depends on the percentage of the area covered by the floating photovoltaic panels, which reached 61.71%, 51.24%, 39.83%, and 27.49% for covering 50%, 40%, 30%, and 20% of the area of Lake Nasser with FPV panels, respectively, as compared to the conventional case without FPV panels.
  • The annual rate of electricity production from the FPV panels system for Lake Nasser reached 467.99 TWh/year, 374.41 TWh/year, 280.787 TWh/year, and 187.21 TWh/year for covering 50%, 40%, 30%, and 20% of Lake Nasser with FPV panels, respectively.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.A., A.E.K. and H.F.A.-E.; Data curation, M.A., A.E.K. and H.F.A.-E.; Formal analysis, M.A., A.E.K., H.F.A.-E. and M.Z.; Investigation, H.F.A.-E., M.Z.; Methodology, H.F.A.-E., M.A. and A.E.K.; Project administration, H.F.A.-E. and M.Z.; Resources, H.F.A.-E. and M.Z.; Software, M.A. and A.E.K.; Supervision, A.E.K. and M.Z.; Validation, M.A., A.E.K. and H.F.A.-E.; Visualization, A.E.K. and M.Z.; Writing—original draft, M.A.; Writing—review and editing, M.A., A.E.K., H.F.A.-E. and M.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

Not available.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Slovak Research and Development Agency under the Contract no. APVV-20-0281. This work was supported by project HUSKROUA/1901/8.1/0072 REVITAL.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Mekonnen, M.M.; Hoekstra, A.Y. Sustainability: Four billion people facing severe water scarcity. Sci. Adv. Feb. 2016, 2, e1500323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Dyak, A.T.A.; Abu-Lehyeh, E.O.; Kiwan, S. Assessment of Implementing Jordan’s Renewable Energy Plan on the Electricity Grid. Jordan J. Mech. Ind. Eng. 2020, 11, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  3. Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations. The Water-Energy-Food Nexus: A New Approach in Support of Food Security and Sustainable Agriculture. 2014. Available online: https://www.fao.org/documents/card/en/c/182bf36b-87fa-4ea5-b898-06c89c88f241/ (accessed on 1 January 2022).
  4. Vernet, A.; Khayesi, J.N.O.; George, V.; George, G.; Bahaj, A.S. How does energy matter? Rural electrification, entrepreneurship, and community development in Kenya. Energy Policy Mar. 2019, 126, 88–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. UN Water. UN World Water Development Report 2021. 2021. Available online: https://www.unwater.org/publications/un-world-water-development-report-2021/ (accessed on 1 January 2022).
  6. Valiantzas, J.D. Simplified versions for the Penman evaporation equation using routine weather data. J. Hydrol. Dec. 2006, 331, 690–702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Adeyemi, O.; Grove, I.; Peets, S.; Norton, T. Advanced Monitoring and Management Systems for Improving Sustainability in Precision Irrigation. Sustainability 2017, 9, 353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Velasco-Muñoz, J.; Aznar-Sánchez, J.; Belmonte-Ureña, L.; Román-Sánchez, I. Sustainable Water Use in Agriculture: A Review of Worldwide Research. Sustainability 2018, 10, 1084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Liu, H.; Kumar, A.; Reindl, T. The Dawn of Floating Solar—Technology, Benefits, and Challenges. In Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2020; Volume 41, pp. 373–383. [Google Scholar]
  10. Cazzaniga, R.; Cicu, M.; Rosa-Clot, M.; Rosa-Clot, P.; Tina, G.M.; Ventura, C. Floating photovoltaic plants: Performance analysis and design solutions. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2018, 81, 1730–1741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Yilmaz, C.; Koyuncu, I.; Alcin, M.; Tuna, M. Artificial Neural Networks based thermodynamic and economic analysis of a hydrogen production system assisted by geothermal energy on Field Programmable Gate Array. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2019, 44, 17443–17459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Redón-Santafé, M.; Ferrer-Gisbert, P.S.; Sánchez-Romero, F.J.; Torregrosa Soler, J.B.; Gozalvez, F.; Javier, J.; Ferrer Gisbert, C.M. Implementation of a photovoltaic floating cover for irrigation reservoirs. J. Clean. Prod. 2014, 66, 568–570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Temiz, M.; Javani, N. Design and analysis of a combined floating photovoltaic system for electricity and hydrogen production. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2020, 45, 3457–3469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Peng, X.; He, C.; Fan, X.; Liu, Q.; Zhang, J.; Wang, H. Photovoltaic devices in hydrogen production. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2014, 39, 14166–14171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Rosa-Clot, M.; Tina, G.M.; Nizetic, S. Floating photovoltaic plants and wastewater ponds: An Australian project. Energy Proc. 2017, 134, 664–674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Hwangbo, S.; Nam, K.; Heo, S.K.; Chang, K.Y. Hydrogen-based self-sustaining integrated renewable electricity network (HySIREN) using a supply-demand forecasting model and deep-learning algorithms. Energy Convers. Manag. 2019, 185, 353–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Mayville, P.; Patil, N.V.; Pearce, J.M. Distributed manufacturing of after market flexible floating photovoltaic modules. Sustain. Energy Technol. Assess 2020, 42, 100830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Tsoutsos, T.; Frantzeskaki, N.; Gekas, V. Environmental impacts from the solar energy technologies. Energy Policy 2005, 33, 289–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Santafé, M.R.; Soler, J.B.T.; Romero, F.J.S.; Gisbert, P.S.F.; Gozálvez, J.J.F.; Gisbert, C.M.F. Theoretical and experimental analysis of a floating photovoltaic cover for water irrigation reservoirs. Energy 2014, 67, 246–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Haas, J.; Khalighi, J.; de la Fuente, A.; Gerbersdorf, S.U.; Nowak, W.; Chen, P.-J. Floating photovoltaic plants: Ecological impacts versus hydropower operation flexibility. Energy Convers. Manag. 2020, 206, 112414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Farfan, J.; Breyer, C. Combining Floating Solar Photovoltaic Power Plants and Hydropower Reservoirs: A Virtual Battery of Great Global Potential. Energy Proc. 2018, 155, 403–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Bhardwaj, S.; Chandrasekhar, E.; Padiyar, P.; Gadre, V.M. A comparative study of wavelet-based ANN and classical techniques for geophysical time-series forecasting. Comput. Geosci. 2020, 138, 104461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Zhou, Y.; Chang, F.-J.; Chang, L.-C.; Lee, W.-D.; Huang, A.; Xu, C.-Y. An advanced complementary scheme of floating photovoltaic and hydropower generation flourishing water-food-energy nexus synergies. Appl. Energy 2020, 275, 115389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Nordin, N.D.; Rahman, H.A. Comparison of optimum design, sizing, and economic analysis of standalone photovoltaic/battery without and with hydrogen production systems. Renew. Energy 2019, 141, 107–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Padilha, C.L.M.; de Andrade Neto, S.; Alves Castelo Branco, D.; Vasconcelos de Freitas, M.A.; da Silva Fidelis, N. Water-energy nexus: Floating photovoltaic systems promoting water security and energy generation in the semiarid region of Brazil. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 273, 122010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Renu, B.; Bora, B.; Prasad, O.S.; Sastry, A.; Kumar, M.; Bangar. Optimum sizing and performance modeling of Solar Photovoltaic (SPV) water pumps for different climatic conditions. Sol. Energy 2017, 155, 1326–1338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Wang, X.; Li, Q.; Chen, W.; Wang, W.; Pu, Y.; Yu, J. Parallel interaction influence of single-stage photovoltaic grid-connected/hydrogen production multi-inverter system based on modal analysis. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2019, 44, 5143–5152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Hadipour, A.; Zargarabadi, M.R.; Rashidi, S. An efficient pulsed- spray water cooling system for photovoltaic panels: Experimental study and cost analysis. Renew. Energy 2021, 64, 867–875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Moraes, C.A.; Valadão, G.F.; Renato, N.S.; Botelho, D.F.; de Oliveira, A.C.L.; Aleman, C.C.; Cunha, F.F. Floating photovoltaic plants as an electricity supply option in the Tocantins-Araguaia basin. Renew. Energy 2022, 193, 264–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Farrar, L.W.; Bahaj, A.S.; James, P.; Anwar, A.; Amdar, N. Floating solar PV to reduce water evaporation in water stressed regions and powering water pumping: Case study Jordan. Energy Convers. Manag. 2022, 260, 115598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Soltani, S.R.K.; Mostafaeipour, A.; Almutairi, K.; Dehshiri, S.J.H.; Dehshiri, S.S.H.; Techato, K. Predicting effect of floating photovoltaic power plant on water loss through surface evaporation for wastewater pond using artificial intelligence: A case study. Sustain. Energy Technol. Assess. 2022, 50, 101849. [Google Scholar]
  32. Ates, A.M. Unlocking the floating photovoltaic potential of Türkiye’s hydroelectric power plants. Renew. Energy 2022, 199, 1495–1509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Location of Lake Nasser, Egpt.
Figure 1. Location of Lake Nasser, Egpt.
Water 15 00635 g001
Figure 2. Image of Lake Nasser, south of Aswan, Egypt (22°25′ N 31°45′ E).
Figure 2. Image of Lake Nasser, south of Aswan, Egypt (22°25′ N 31°45′ E).
Water 15 00635 g002
Figure 3. Photo of floating photovoltaic (FPV) panels.
Figure 3. Photo of floating photovoltaic (FPV) panels.
Water 15 00635 g003
Figure 4. Average daily solar irradiation and daily ambient temperature of the city of Aswan, Egypt (22°25′ N 31°45′ E).
Figure 4. Average daily solar irradiation and daily ambient temperature of the city of Aswan, Egypt (22°25′ N 31°45′ E).
Water 15 00635 g004
Figure 5. Average daily evaporation for each month throughout the year for the cases with and without FPV panels.
Figure 5. Average daily evaporation for each month throughout the year for the cases with and without FPV panels.
Water 15 00635 g005
Figure 6. Average daily evaporation savings for each month of the year during the installation of FPV panels on Lake Nasser.
Figure 6. Average daily evaporation savings for each month of the year during the installation of FPV panels on Lake Nasser.
Water 15 00635 g006
Figure 7. Average volume of daily water evaporation savings for each month of the year during the installation of FPV panels on Lake Nasser.
Figure 7. Average volume of daily water evaporation savings for each month of the year during the installation of FPV panels on Lake Nasser.
Water 15 00635 g007
Figure 8. Daily electricity generation of a floating photovoltaic array installed on Lake Nasser.
Figure 8. Daily electricity generation of a floating photovoltaic array installed on Lake Nasser.
Water 15 00635 g008
Table 1. Parameters and variables calculated for Lake Nasser, city of Aswan, Egypt (22° 25′ N 31°45′ E).
Table 1. Parameters and variables calculated for Lake Nasser, city of Aswan, Egypt (22° 25′ N 31°45′ E).
Months A r e s   ( km 2 ) Q (MJ/m2/Day) T a   ( ° C ) E (mm/Day)
January525014.30919.53.933
February525016.77923.54.853
March525020.347286.146
April525024.93438.69.026
May525027.99239.59.844
June525029.20741.110.447
July525028.69740.910.294
August525027.52141.710.215
September525023.28740.29.002
October525018.46536.37.303
November525014.81931.25.780
December525013.91722.84.356
Table 2. Water evaporation savings results (Case Study 1 and Case Study 2).
Table 2. Water evaporation savings results (Case Study 1 and Case Study 2).
MonthsCase Study 1Case Study 2
x Q t o t   ( MJ / m 2 / Day ) E F P V
(mm/Day)
E W S   ×   10 6
(m3/Month)
E W S   ×   10 6
(m3/Year)
x Q t o t   ( MJ / m 2 / Day ) E F P V
(mm/Day)
E W S   ×   10 6
(m3/Month)
E W S   ×   10 6
(m3/Year)
January0.58.1061.591381.297-0.49.34651.999314.833-
February0.59.3841.916431.768-0.410.86332.422357.422-
March0.511.2192.354617.196-0.413.04432.997512.487-
April0.513.6383.361892.274-0.415.8974.309742.856-
May0.515.1783.5901017.769-0.417.74064.628848.894-
June0.515.8053.7851049.224-0.418.48584.887875.624-
July0.515.5483.7421066.47-0.418.1784.827889.78-
August0.514.9703.7431052.758-0.417.48034.819877.695-
September0.512.8343.399882.455-0.414.92494.343733.733-
October0.510.3752.867722.022-0.411.99333.628598.058-
November0.58.4922.347540.74-0.49.75722.947446.279-
December0.57.9461.775420.11-0.49.13992.226346.591-
9074.081 7544.251
Table 3. Water evaporation savings results (Case Study 3 and Case Study 4).
Table 3. Water evaporation savings results (Case Study 3 and Case Study 4).
MonthsCase Study 3Case Study 4
x Q t o t   ( MJ / m 2 / Day ) E F P V
(mm/Day)
E W S   ×   10 6
(m3/Month)
E W S   ×   10 6
(m3/Year)
x Q t o t   ( MJ / m 2 / Day ) E F P V
(mm/Day)
E W S   ×   10 6
(m3/Month)
E W S   ×   10 6
(m3/Year)
January0.310.5872.437243.472-0.211.8282.906167.212-
February0.312.3422.969277.072-0.213.8213.556190.718-
March0.314.873.698398.413-0.216.6964.456274.974-
April0.318.1565.350578.919-0.220.4156.483400.465-
May0.320.3035.772662.68-0.222.8667.023459.126-
June0.321.1666.105683.902-0.223.8467.437474.057-
July0.320.8086.025694.788-0.223.4387.336481.494-
August0.319.9916.003684.887-0.222.5017.297474.335-
September0.317.0155.376571.127-0.219.1066.496394.636-
October0.313.6114.453463.873-0.215.2295.3399319.469-
November0.311.0233.5899344.974-0.212.2884.277236.827-
December0.310.3342.710267.821-0.211.5293.227183.799-
5871.927 4057.111
Table 4. Floating photovoltaic (FPV) panels generation results.
Table 4. Floating photovoltaic (FPV) panels generation results.
Months A r e s   ( km 2 ) Case Study 1Case Study 2Case Study 3Case Study 4
x FPVep (TWh/
Month)
FPVep (TWh/
Year)
x FPVep (TWh/
Month)
FPVep (TWh/
Year)
x FPVep (TWh/
Month)
FPVep (TWh/
Year)
x FPVep (TWh/
Month)
FPVep (TWh/
Year)
January52500.528.32-0.422.67-0.316.99-0.211.33-
February52500.529.42-0.423.53-0.317.65-0.211.77-
March52500.538.57-0.430.86-0.323.14-0.215.43-
April52500.543.46-0.434.77-0.326.08-0.217.39-
May52500.549.96-0.439.97-0.329.97-0.219.98-
June52500.550-0.440-0.330-0.220-
July52500.550.85-0.440.68-0.330.51-0.220.34-
August52500.548.7-0.438.96-0.329.22-0.219.48-
September52500.540.44-0.432.35-0.324.26-0.216.18-
October52500.533.96-0.427.17-0.320.377-0.213.58-
November52500.527.09-0.421.68-0.316.26-0.210.84-
December52500.527.22-0.421.77-0.316.33-0.210.89-
467.99 374.41 280.787 187.21
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Abdelgaied, M.; Kabeel, A.E.; Zeleňáková, M.; Abd-Elhamid, H.F. Floating Photovoltaic Plants as an Effective Option to Reduce Water Evaporation in Water-Stressed Regions and Produce Electricity: A Case Study of Lake Nasser, Egypt. Water 2023, 15, 635. https://doi.org/10.3390/w15040635

AMA Style

Abdelgaied M, Kabeel AE, Zeleňáková M, Abd-Elhamid HF. Floating Photovoltaic Plants as an Effective Option to Reduce Water Evaporation in Water-Stressed Regions and Produce Electricity: A Case Study of Lake Nasser, Egypt. Water. 2023; 15(4):635. https://doi.org/10.3390/w15040635

Chicago/Turabian Style

Abdelgaied, Mohamed, Abd Elnaby Kabeel, Martina Zeleňáková, and Hany F. Abd-Elhamid. 2023. "Floating Photovoltaic Plants as an Effective Option to Reduce Water Evaporation in Water-Stressed Regions and Produce Electricity: A Case Study of Lake Nasser, Egypt" Water 15, no. 4: 635. https://doi.org/10.3390/w15040635

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop