Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Political Behavior 3/2019

18-05-2018 | Original Paper

Reconciling Sexism and Women’s Support for Republican Candidates: A Look at Gender, Class, and Whiteness in the 2012 and 2016 Presidential Races

Authors: Erin C. Cassese, Tiffany D. Barnes

Published in: Political Behavior | Issue 3/2019

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Much of the gender gap literature focuses on women’s greater average liberalism relative to men. This approach masks considerable heterogeneity in political identity and behavior among women based on race, class, and other key socio-demographic characteristics. In the 2016 Presidential contest, political divisions among women were evident in exit polling, which demonstrated that a majority of white women voted for Donald Trump. This was not an anomaly but reflects a more long-standing distinction between white women and women of other racial and ethnic identifications. In this paper, we draw on intersectionality and system justification theory as frameworks for exploring the distinctive political behavior of white women. Using data from the 2012 and 2016 American National Election Studies, we evaluate the factors that attracted white women voters to the GOP and kept them in the fold in spite of expectations that sexism in the campaign would drive women away from the party during the 2016 Presidential race. Our analyses show that many white women endorse sexist beliefs, and that these beliefs were strong determinants of their vote choice in 2016, more so than in 2012. Our findings also point to important divisions among white women based on educational attainment and household income in terms of both the endorsement of sexism and vote choice. These results shed new light on white women’s political behavior and qualify the existing gender gap literature in important ways, offering new insights into the ways whiteness, gender, and class intersect to shape political behavior.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Footnotes
1
See Table A2 in the Online Appendix for complete descriptive data on voters in 2012 and 2016. No shifts were observed in vote choice among white Americans generally or among college-educated Americans. The primary change is the one depicted in Fig. 2.
 
2
We selected this significance level because adjusted Wald tests offer a conservative test of the change in coefficient size for logit models, see Williams (2009).
 
3
The measures for hostile sexism and perceived discrimination against women are correlated at − 0.15 (− 0.09 for women and − 0.20 for men) in 2012 and − 0.20 (− 0.17 for women and − 0.22 for men) in 2016.
 
4
We also used 101-point feeling thermometers for both Republican presidential candidates to determine whether candidate evaluations were more polarized for some groups of men and women. Tables A4 and A6 of the Online Appendix demonstrates that the results for vote choice reported in Table 3 are consistent with feelings towards Romney and Trump.
 
5
Replication materials are available at: https://​doi.​org/​10.​7910/​DVN/​QHMXAQ.
 
6
We include these covariates based on work by Barnes and Cassese (2017), which demonstrates these factors are important sources of variation among women, in order to rule out competing explanations for our findings.
 
7
Income is only modestly correlated with hostile sexism at − 0.11 in 2012 and − 0.15 in 2016, and with perceived discrimination against women at − 0.13 in 2012 and − 0.07 in 2016. .
 
8
Table A6 in the Online Appendix demonstrates that our results are also robust when controlling for the urban/rural residency of respondents; rurality was only measured for the face-to-face subsample of the ANES.
 
Literature
go back to reference Barnes, T. D., Beaulieu, E., & Saxton, G. (2018). Sex and corruption: How sexism shapes voters’ responses to scandal. Politics, Groups & Identities. Barnes, T. D., Beaulieu, E., & Saxton, G. (2018). Sex and corruption: How sexism shapes voters’ responses to scandal. Politics, Groups & Identities.
go back to reference Barnes, T., & Cassese, E. (2017). American party women: A look at the gender gap within parties. Political Research Quarterly, 70(1), 127–141.CrossRef Barnes, T., & Cassese, E. (2017). American party women: A look at the gender gap within parties. Political Research Quarterly, 70(1), 127–141.CrossRef
go back to reference Begany, J. J., & Milburn, M. A. (2002). Psychological predictors of sexual harassment: Authoritarianism, hostile sexism, and rape myths. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 3(2), 119–126.CrossRef Begany, J. J., & Milburn, M. A. (2002). Psychological predictors of sexual harassment: Authoritarianism, hostile sexism, and rape myths. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 3(2), 119–126.CrossRef
go back to reference Bock, J., Byrd-Craven, J., & Burkley, M. (2017). The role of sexism in voting in the 2016 presidential election. Personality and Individual Differences, 119(1), 189–193.CrossRef Bock, J., Byrd-Craven, J., & Burkley, M. (2017). The role of sexism in voting in the 2016 presidential election. Personality and Individual Differences, 119(1), 189–193.CrossRef
go back to reference Box-Steffensmeier, J. M., De Boef, S., & Lin, T.-M. (2004). The dynamics of the partisan gender gap. American Political Science Review, 98(3), 515–528.CrossRef Box-Steffensmeier, J. M., De Boef, S., & Lin, T.-M. (2004). The dynamics of the partisan gender gap. American Political Science Review, 98(3), 515–528.CrossRef
go back to reference Brown, N. E., & Gershon, S. A. (2016). Introduction. In N. E. Brown & S. A. Gershon (Eds.), Distinct identities: Minority women in US politics (pp. 1–11). New York: Routledge.CrossRef Brown, N. E., & Gershon, S. A. (2016). Introduction. In N. E. Brown & S. A. Gershon (Eds.), Distinct identities: Minority women in US politics (pp. 1–11). New York: Routledge.CrossRef
go back to reference Carroll, S. (2006). Voting choices: Meet you at the gender gap. In S. J. Carroll & R. Fox (Eds.), Gender and elections: Shaping the future of American politics (pp. 74–96). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Carroll, S. (2006). Voting choices: Meet you at the gender gap. In S. J. Carroll & R. Fox (Eds.), Gender and elections: Shaping the future of American politics (pp. 74–96). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
go back to reference Cassese, E., & Barnes, T. (2018). Intersectional motherhood: Investigating public support for child care subsidies. Politics, Groups & Identities. Cassese, E., & Barnes, T. (2018). Intersectional motherhood: Investigating public support for child care subsidies. Politics, Groups & Identities.
go back to reference Cassese, E. C., Barnes, T. D., & Branton, R. P. (2015). Racializing gender: Public opinion at the intersection. Politics & Gender, 11(1), 1–26.CrossRef Cassese, E. C., Barnes, T. D., & Branton, R. P. (2015). Racializing gender: Public opinion at the intersection. Politics & Gender, 11(1), 1–26.CrossRef
go back to reference Cassese, E., & Holman, M. R. (2016). Religious beliefs, gender consciousness, and women’s political participation. Sex Roles., 75(9), 514–527.CrossRef Cassese, E., & Holman, M. R. (2016). Religious beliefs, gender consciousness, and women’s political participation. Sex Roles., 75(9), 514–527.CrossRef
go back to reference Cassese, E., & Holman, M. R. (Forthcoming) Playing the woman card: Ambivalent sexism in the 2016 U.S. presidential race. Political Psychology. Cassese, E., & Holman, M. R. (Forthcoming) Playing the woman card: Ambivalent sexism in the 2016 U.S. presidential race. Political Psychology.
go back to reference Chaney, C. K., Michael Alvarez, R., & Nagler, J. (1998). Explaining the gender gap in U.S. presidential elections, 1980-1992. Political Research Quarterly, 51(2), 311–339. Chaney, C. K., Michael Alvarez, R., & Nagler, J. (1998). Explaining the gender gap in U.S. presidential elections, 1980-1992. Political Research Quarterly, 51(2), 311–339.
go back to reference Choo, H. Y., & Ferree, M. M. (2010). Practicing intersectionality in sociological research: A critical analysis of inclusions, interactions, and institutions in the study of inequalities. Sociological Theory, 28(2), 129–149.CrossRef Choo, H. Y., & Ferree, M. M. (2010). Practicing intersectionality in sociological research: A critical analysis of inclusions, interactions, and institutions in the study of inequalities. Sociological Theory, 28(2), 129–149.CrossRef
go back to reference Christopher, A. N., & Mull, M. S. (2006). Conservative ideology and ambivalent sexism. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 30(2), 223–230.CrossRef Christopher, A. N., & Mull, M. S. (2006). Conservative ideology and ambivalent sexism. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 30(2), 223–230.CrossRef
go back to reference Cole, E. R. (2009). Intersectionality and research in psychology. American Psychologist, 64(3), 170–180.CrossRef Cole, E. R. (2009). Intersectionality and research in psychology. American Psychologist, 64(3), 170–180.CrossRef
go back to reference Collins, P. H. (1993). Toward a New Vision: Race, class, and gender as categories of analysis and connection. Race, Sex & Class, 1(1), 25–45. Collins, P. H. (1993). Toward a New Vision: Race, class, and gender as categories of analysis and connection. Race, Sex & Class, 1(1), 25–45.
go back to reference Collins, P. H. (2002). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment. Boston: Unwin Hyman.CrossRef Collins, P. H. (2002). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment. Boston: Unwin Hyman.CrossRef
go back to reference Collins, P. H., & Bilge, S. (2016). Intersectionality. Malden, MA: Wiley. Collins, P. H., & Bilge, S. (2016). Intersectionality. Malden, MA: Wiley.
go back to reference Crenshaw, K. W. (1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 1(8), 139–167. Crenshaw, K. W. (1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 1(8), 139–167.
go back to reference Deckman, M. (2016). Tea party women: Mama grizzlies, grassroots leaders, and the changing face of the American right. New York: NYU Press.CrossRef Deckman, M. (2016). Tea party women: Mama grizzlies, grassroots leaders, and the changing face of the American right. New York: NYU Press.CrossRef
go back to reference Diekman, A. B., & Schneider, M. C. (2010). A social role theory perspective on gender gaps in political attitudes. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 34(4), 486–497.CrossRef Diekman, A. B., & Schneider, M. C. (2010). A social role theory perspective on gender gaps in political attitudes. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 34(4), 486–497.CrossRef
go back to reference Frankenberg, R. (1993). White women, race matters: The social construction of whiteness. St. Paul: University of Minnesota Press.CrossRef Frankenberg, R. (1993). White women, race matters: The social construction of whiteness. St. Paul: University of Minnesota Press.CrossRef
go back to reference Gillion, D. Q., Ladd, J. M., & Meredith, M. (Forthcoming). Party polarization, ideological sorting and the emergence of the partisan gender gap. British Journal of Political Science. Gillion, D. Q., Ladd, J. M., & Meredith, M. (Forthcoming). Party polarization, ideological sorting and the emergence of the partisan gender gap. British Journal of Political Science.
go back to reference Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1996). The ambivalent sexism inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(3), 491–512.CrossRef Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1996). The ambivalent sexism inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(3), 491–512.CrossRef
go back to reference Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (2001). An ambivalent alliance. American Psychologist, 56(2), 109–118.CrossRef Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (2001). An ambivalent alliance. American Psychologist, 56(2), 109–118.CrossRef
go back to reference Hancock, A.-M. (2016). Intersectionality: An intellectual history. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRef Hancock, A.-M. (2016). Intersectionality: An intellectual history. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRef
go back to reference Hebl, M. R., King, E. B., Glick, P., Singletary, S. L., & Kazama, S. (2007). Hostile and benevolent reactions toward pregnant women. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(6), 1499–1511.CrossRef Hebl, M. R., King, E. B., Glick, P., Singletary, S. L., & Kazama, S. (2007). Hostile and benevolent reactions toward pregnant women. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(6), 1499–1511.CrossRef
go back to reference Huddy, L. (2003). From group identity to political cohesion and commitment. In D. O. Sears, L. Huddy, & R. Jervis (Eds.), Oxford handbook of political psychology (pp. 511–558). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Huddy, L. (2003). From group identity to political cohesion and commitment. In D. O. Sears, L. Huddy, & R. Jervis (Eds.), Oxford handbook of political psychology (pp. 511–558). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
go back to reference Hurtado, A., & Stewart, A. J. (2004). Through the looking glass: Implications of studying whiteness for feminist methods. In M. Fine, L. Weis, L. P. Pruitt, & A. Burns (Eds.), Off white: Readings on power, privilege, and resistance (pp. 315–330). New York: Routledge. Hurtado, A., & Stewart, A. J. (2004). Through the looking glass: Implications of studying whiteness for feminist methods. In M. Fine, L. Weis, L. P. Pruitt, & A. Burns (Eds.), Off white: Readings on power, privilege, and resistance (pp. 315–330). New York: Routledge.
go back to reference Iverson, T., & Rosenbluth, F. (2010). Women, work & politics. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. Iverson, T., & Rosenbluth, F. (2010). Women, work & politics. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
go back to reference Jost, J. T., Nosek, B. A., & Gosling, S. D. (2008). Ideology: Its resurgence in social, personality, and political psychology. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3(2), 126–136.CrossRef Jost, J. T., Nosek, B. A., & Gosling, S. D. (2008). Ideology: Its resurgence in social, personality, and political psychology. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3(2), 126–136.CrossRef
go back to reference Junn, J. (2017). The Trump Majority: white womanhood and the making of female voters in the U.S. Politics, Groups, and Identities, 5(2), 343–352.CrossRef Junn, J. (2017). The Trump Majority: white womanhood and the making of female voters in the U.S. Politics, Groups, and Identities, 5(2), 343–352.CrossRef
go back to reference Katz, J. (2016). Man enough? Donald Trump, Hillary Clinton, and the politics of presidential masculinity. Northhampton, MA: Interlink Books. Katz, J. (2016). Man enough? Donald Trump, Hillary Clinton, and the politics of presidential masculinity. Northhampton, MA: Interlink Books.
go back to reference Kaufmann, K. M., & Petrocik, J. R. (1999). The changing politics of American Men: Understanding the sources of the gender gap. American Journal of Political Science, 43(3), 864–887.CrossRef Kaufmann, K. M., & Petrocik, J. R. (1999). The changing politics of American Men: Understanding the sources of the gender gap. American Journal of Political Science, 43(3), 864–887.CrossRef
go back to reference Kellstadt, P. M., Peterson, D. A., & Ramirez, M. D. (2010). The macro politics of a gender gap. Public Opinion Quarterly, 74(3), 477–498.CrossRef Kellstadt, P. M., Peterson, D. A., & Ramirez, M. D. (2010). The macro politics of a gender gap. Public Opinion Quarterly, 74(3), 477–498.CrossRef
go back to reference Levine-Rasky, C. (2011). Intersectionality theory applied to whiteness and middle-classness. Social Identities, 17(2), 239–253.CrossRef Levine-Rasky, C. (2011). Intersectionality theory applied to whiteness and middle-classness. Social Identities, 17(2), 239–253.CrossRef
go back to reference Mansbridge, J. J. (1985). Myth and Reality: The ERA and the gender gap in the 1980 election. Public Opinion Quarterly, 49(2), 164–178.CrossRef Mansbridge, J. J. (1985). Myth and Reality: The ERA and the gender gap in the 1980 election. Public Opinion Quarterly, 49(2), 164–178.CrossRef
go back to reference Manza, J., & Brooks, C. (1998). The gender gap in US presidential elections: When? Why? Implications? American Journal of Sociology, 103(5), 1235–1266.CrossRef Manza, J., & Brooks, C. (1998). The gender gap in US presidential elections: When? Why? Implications? American Journal of Sociology, 103(5), 1235–1266.CrossRef
go back to reference Masser, B. M., & Abrams, D. (2004). Reinforcing the glass ceiling: The consequences of hostile sexism for female managerial candidates. Sex Roles, 51(9–10), 609–615.CrossRef Masser, B. M., & Abrams, D. (2004). Reinforcing the glass ceiling: The consequences of hostile sexism for female managerial candidates. Sex Roles, 51(9–10), 609–615.CrossRef
go back to reference Masser, B., Tendayi Viki, G., & Power, C. (2006). Hostile sexism and rape proclivity amongst men. Sex Roles, 54(7/8), 565–574.CrossRef Masser, B., Tendayi Viki, G., & Power, C. (2006). Hostile sexism and rape proclivity amongst men. Sex Roles, 54(7/8), 565–574.CrossRef
go back to reference McCall, L. (2005). The complexity of intersectionality. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 30(3), 1771–1800.CrossRef McCall, L. (2005). The complexity of intersectionality. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 30(3), 1771–1800.CrossRef
go back to reference Norrander, B. (2008). The history of the gender gaps. In L. D. Whittaker (Ed.), Voting the gender gap (pp. 9–32). Champaign, IL: University of Illinois Press. Norrander, B. (2008). The history of the gender gaps. In L. D. Whittaker (Ed.), Voting the gender gap (pp. 9–32). Champaign, IL: University of Illinois Press.
go back to reference Norrander, B., & Wilcox, C. (2008). The gender gap in ideology. Political Behavior, 30(4), 503–523.CrossRef Norrander, B., & Wilcox, C. (2008). The gender gap in ideology. Political Behavior, 30(4), 503–523.CrossRef
go back to reference Ondercin, H. L. (2013). What Scarlet O’Hara thinks: Political attitudes of Southern women. Political Science Quarterly, 128(2), 233–259.CrossRef Ondercin, H. L. (2013). What Scarlet O’Hara thinks: Political attitudes of Southern women. Political Science Quarterly, 128(2), 233–259.CrossRef
go back to reference Ondercin, H. L. (2017). Who is responsible for the gender gap? The dynamics of men’s and women’s democratic macropartisanship, 1950–2012. Political Research Quarterly, 70(4), 749–761.CrossRef Ondercin, H. L. (2017). Who is responsible for the gender gap? The dynamics of men’s and women’s democratic macropartisanship, 1950–2012. Political Research Quarterly, 70(4), 749–761.CrossRef
go back to reference Redlawsk, D. P. (2002). Hot cognition or cool consideration? Testing the effects of motivated reasoning on political decision making. Journal of Politics, 64(4), 1021–1044.CrossRef Redlawsk, D. P. (2002). Hot cognition or cool consideration? Testing the effects of motivated reasoning on political decision making. Journal of Politics, 64(4), 1021–1044.CrossRef
go back to reference Sapiro, V., & Conover, P. J. (1997). The variable gender basis of electoral politics: Gender and context in the 1992 US election. British Journal of Political Science, 27(4), 497–523.CrossRef Sapiro, V., & Conover, P. J. (1997). The variable gender basis of electoral politics: Gender and context in the 1992 US election. British Journal of Political Science, 27(4), 497–523.CrossRef
go back to reference Schaffner, B., MacWilliams, M., & Nteta, T. (2018). Explaining white polarization in the 2016 vote for president: The sobering role of racism and sexism. Political Studies Quarterly, 133(1), 9–34. Schaffner, B., MacWilliams, M., & Nteta, T. (2018). Explaining white polarization in the 2016 vote for president: The sobering role of racism and sexism. Political Studies Quarterly, 133(1), 9–34.
go back to reference Schreiber, R. (2014). Understanding the future of feminism requires understanding conservative women. Politics & Gender, 10(2), 276–280.CrossRef Schreiber, R. (2014). Understanding the future of feminism requires understanding conservative women. Politics & Gender, 10(2), 276–280.CrossRef
go back to reference Seltzer, R., Newman, J., & Leighton, M. V. (1997). Sex as a political variable: Women as candidates and voters in US elections. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner. Seltzer, R., Newman, J., & Leighton, M. V. (1997). Sex as a political variable: Women as candidates and voters in US elections. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
go back to reference Sue, D. W. (2004). Whiteness and ethnocentric monoculturalism: Making the ‘invisible’ visible. American Psychologist, 59(8), 761–769.CrossRef Sue, D. W. (2004). Whiteness and ethnocentric monoculturalism: Making the ‘invisible’ visible. American Psychologist, 59(8), 761–769.CrossRef
go back to reference Swim, J. K., Aikin, K. J., Hall, W. S., & Hunter, B. A. (1995). Sexism and racism: Old-fashioned and modern prejudices. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68(2), 199–214.CrossRef Swim, J. K., Aikin, K. J., Hall, W. S., & Hunter, B. A. (1995). Sexism and racism: Old-fashioned and modern prejudices. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68(2), 199–214.CrossRef
go back to reference Valentino, N. A., Wayne, C., & Oceno, M. (2018). Mobilizing sexism: The interaction of emotion and gender attitudes in the 2016 US presidential election. Public Opinion Quarterly, 82(1), 213–235. Valentino, N. A., Wayne, C., & Oceno, M. (2018). Mobilizing sexism: The interaction of emotion and gender attitudes in the 2016 US presidential election. Public Opinion Quarterly, 82(1), 213–235.
go back to reference Welch, S., & Hibbing, J. (1992). Financial conditions, gender and voting in american national elections. Journal of Politics, 54(1), 197–213.CrossRef Welch, S., & Hibbing, J. (1992). Financial conditions, gender and voting in american national elections. Journal of Politics, 54(1), 197–213.CrossRef
go back to reference Wellman, D. T. (1993). Portraits of white racism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Wellman, D. T. (1993). Portraits of white racism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
go back to reference Williams, R. (2009). Using heterogeneous choice models to compare logit and probit coefficients across groups. Sociological Methods and Research, 37(4), 531–559.CrossRef Williams, R. (2009). Using heterogeneous choice models to compare logit and probit coefficients across groups. Sociological Methods and Research, 37(4), 531–559.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Reconciling Sexism and Women’s Support for Republican Candidates: A Look at Gender, Class, and Whiteness in the 2012 and 2016 Presidential Races
Authors
Erin C. Cassese
Tiffany D. Barnes
Publication date
18-05-2018
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Political Behavior / Issue 3/2019
Print ISSN: 0190-9320
Electronic ISSN: 1573-6687
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-018-9468-2

Other articles of this Issue 3/2019

Political Behavior 3/2019 Go to the issue