Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

The California Version of The Green New Deal...

Posted on 10/15/21 at 9:40 am
Posted by djmed
Member since Aug 2020
2581 posts
Posted on 10/15/21 at 9:40 am
The California Version of The Green New Deal and an October 16, 2020, EPA Settlement With Transportation is What’s Creating The Container Shipping Backlog – Working CA Ports 24/7 Will Not Help, Here’s Why

Hundreds of requests for details on the specifics of the container shipping backlog. So, I spent 3 days calling sources, digging for details and gathering information on the substantive issue at hand. The epicenter of the problem is not what is being outlined by financial media, corporate media and politicians who have a specific interest in distracting from the issues at hand. This has nothing to do with COVID-19.

The issues being discussed today relate to events that happened a long time ago. As a matter of fact, it was so predictable that Amazon, Walmart, UPS, FedEx, Samsung, The Home Depot and Target all had taken actions years ago -long before COVID- because they knew this day would come. It was not accidental that those companies showed up at the White House to discuss the issue, because there’s now a full court press to hide it.

There is one very specific regional issue driving the problem. Read on:



The trucking issue with California LA ports, ie the Port of Los Angeles (POLA) and the Port of Long Beach (POLB), is that all semi tractors have to be current with new California emissions standards. As a consequence, that mean trucks cannot be older than 3 years if they are to pick up or deliver containers at those ports. This issue wipes out approximately half of the fleet trucks used to move containers in/out of the port. Operating the port 24/7 will not cure the issue, because all it does is pile up more containers that sit idle as they await a limited number of trucks to pick them up. THIS is the central issue.

On October 16, 2020, the EPA reached a settlement agreement [DATA HERE] with California Air Resource Board (CARB) to shut down semi tractor rigs that were non-compliant with new California emission standards:

2020 SAN FRANCISCO – “Today, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announced settlements with three interstate trucking companies imposing $417,000 in penalties for violating the California Air Resources Board’s federally enforceable Truck and Bus Regulation, Drayage Truck Regulation and Transport Refrigeration Unit Regulation.

“As trucks are one of the largest sources of air pollution in California, EPA will continue to ensure these heavy-duty vehicles have the needed pollution-control equipment and operate in compliance with the rules,” said EPA Pacific Southwest Regional Administrator John Busterud. “These companies have agreed to bring their trucks into compliance and operate more cleanly in all communities they serve.”


Transportation is a primary contributor to the high levels of air pollutants in Southern California and the Central Valley. Diesel emissions from trucks are one of the state’s largest sources of fine particle pollution, or soot, which is linked to health issues including asthma, impaired lung development in children, and cardiovascular effects in adults. Many of these trucks are older models and emit high amounts of particulate matter (PM) and nitrogen oxides (NOx).

[…] California Truck and Bus Regulation and Drayage Truck Regulation have been essential parts of the state’s federally enforceable plan to attain cleaner air. California requires trucking companies to upgrade vehicles they own to meet specific NOx and PM performance standards and to verify compliance of vehicles they hire or dispatch. Heavy-duty diesel trucks in California must meet 2010 engine emissions standards or use diesel particulate filters to reduce the diesel particulates emissions into the atmosphere by 85% or more. (read more)

In effect, what this 2020 determination and settlement created was an inability of half the nation’s truckers from picking up anything from the Port of LA or Port of Long Beach. Virtually all private owner operator trucks and half of the fleet trucks that are used for moving containers across the nation were shut out.

LINK
Posted by lsunatchamp
Member since Feb 2009
2024 posts
Posted on 10/15/21 at 9:52 am to
I don't understand the 3 year rule. If a truck is equipped with the DPF and DOC then the emissions of soot and NOX are virtually 0. All trucks after 2010 have this.
For those that dont know. DPF(Diesel Particulate Filter) filters out the soot. DOC(Diesel Oxidation Catalyst) is what the def fluid is for, basically turns harmful NOX gases into oxygen and hydrogen.
Posted by loogaroo
Welsh
Member since Dec 2005
30321 posts
Posted on 10/15/21 at 9:58 am to
I don't doubt this at all, but what is the problem at Savannah, GA?
Posted by CitizenK
BR
Member since Aug 2019
9344 posts
Posted on 10/15/21 at 11:03 am to
Also AB5 so private tractor trailer owner operators cannot work in CA.
Posted by teke184
Zachary, LA
Member since Jan 2007
94769 posts
Posted on 10/15/21 at 11:05 am to
My understanding with Savannah is that they are unloading a ton of containers but no one is coming to pick them up.

Possibly because too many goddamn ships are anchored and waiting to offload for them to worry about shipping empties back to the port of origin to be reloaded.
Posted by Chazreinhold
Utah
Member since Oct 2020
5724 posts
Posted on 10/15/21 at 11:10 am to
What a surprise ! Leftist insane policy’s are the root of most all the problems in this country.
Their ideology is a Forrest Fire and a Cancer, we have a front row seat for this shite show.
Posted by TigerStripes30
Alexandria, LA
Member since Dec 2011
6369 posts
Posted on 10/15/21 at 11:11 am to
i say all of the approved trucks go to California and truck the shite just outside of the California line and have trade offs with others to disperse and anything that is supposed to go to California or stay there doesn't move...they will change there tune really quick
Posted by teke184
Zachary, LA
Member since Jan 2007
94769 posts
Posted on 10/15/21 at 11:12 am to
What is more wasteful, having older trucks which may have pollution slightly above their standards or constantly having to buy new trucks every 3 years because there appears to be no way to rehab old trucks?
Posted by lsunatchamp
Member since Feb 2009
2024 posts
Posted on 10/15/21 at 11:32 am to
The only thing I can figure is if the companies have to keep buying trucks every three years, they will all just switch to electric trucks when they finally do come out with a model that makes sense and can go 100s of miles without recharging. Still not sold on how that helps with greenhouse gases in the long-term though
Posted by Nosevens
Member since Apr 2019
10225 posts
Posted on 10/15/21 at 12:09 pm to
You are the hammer on the nail here . The amount of energy it takes to make everything on a truck far outweighs the savings
Posted by bayoudude
Member since Dec 2007
24947 posts
Posted on 10/15/21 at 12:13 pm to
Big rigs are not meant to be disposable like our daily drivers. These are $250,000 plus machines made to travel over a million miles in their service life. Libs are truly retarded
Posted by hawgfaninc
https://youtu.be/torc9P4-k5A
Member since Nov 2011
46311 posts
Posted on 10/15/21 at 12:59 pm to
Interesting
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram